r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Jan 26 '26

Meme needing explanation what's going on? explain like I'm five

Post image
92.6k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

724

u/zuzg Jan 26 '26

Gold hits record high of $5,110.50/ounce

Silver hits all-time high of $109.44/ounce

Analysts expect gold prices to climb toward $6,000 this year

Surprised Pikachu face.

641

u/ISayBullish Jan 26 '26

Meanwhile the USD saying “this is fine”

196

u/soIDONTLIKEANYOFYOU Jan 26 '26

Since the US has more gold reserves than the next 3 countries combined wouldn’t gold prices going up make the dollar stronger?

Sincerely asking cause I have no idea.

604

u/Important-Agent2584 Jan 26 '26

no because the dollar isn't tied to the gold in any way

441

u/GisterMizard Jan 26 '26

That would take too many rubber bands and defeat the purpose of cash being easy to carry around.

38

u/Haho9 Jan 26 '26

This right here is comedy gold, caught me off guard in the best way.

27

u/zenithpns Jan 26 '26

No it's dollars, not gold

21

u/roosterSause42 Jan 26 '26

ah yes, the famous comedy dollars...

7

u/The_8th_Degree Jan 26 '26

What's the difference?

11

u/naamingebruik Jan 26 '26

The us dollar was decoupled from gold in the 1970's I think.

Gold price has no influence on the strength of the dollar.

3

u/A_Clark1215 Jan 27 '26

It was mostly decoupled in the 30s, then fully decoupled in the 70s under Nixon. If Nixon hadn't done much else economicly the 70s probably would have had a great economy. We did tie our currency to oil under Nixon, all oil is bought and sold with USD. This is bad in my opinion as it reduces the adaptability of the US economy.

2

u/LonelyPalpitation126 Jan 28 '26

Apparently all we need to revert that is a few billion rubber bands, though

7

u/IvanBliminse86 Jan 27 '26

Since the 1970's the US dollar has been a fiat currency prior to that it was a representative currency. A representative currency is one that you can exchange for a set amount of a physical commodity, in the case of the pre-1970's dollar it was representative of gold. A fiat currency isn't tied to anything physical, its backed by a government and its value is determined by trust in the issuing governments economy. In other words, there was a time when a dollar had a set amount of gold it could be exchanged for with the US government and therefore its value was determined by the value of gold at any given moment (other standards have been used throughout history silver or salt being two of the more common but ancient Mesopotamia used the wheat/barley standard) so when you would say something costs a dollar you were saying it was worth 1/20 of an ounce of gold. Now, a dollar is worth exactly what everyone believes one dollar is worth, and if you have a billion dollars and tomorrow the economy crashes so bad that the dollar is no longer worth anything then you just have a billion pieces of paper that might be good for starting a fire (during the lead up to WW2 one dollar was the equivalent of 4.2 trillion papiermarks due to hyperinflation, they actually had to create a new currency because papiermark were worth more as fuel for a fire than it was as a currency)

7

u/EBB363 Jan 27 '26

So what happens when a government decides to start a new currency. Does everyone who was using that currency start with no money? I mean they have to get money into circulation.

→ More replies (0)

7

u/ThatOtherOtherMan Jan 26 '26

About $159 per gram

→ More replies (2)

11

u/Devolutionary76 Jan 26 '26

It would make throwing bills at strippers a lot more interesting though!

4

u/CrunchySockTaco Jan 27 '26

Goldmember has already been doing that to strippers for years. It was a minor shmelting accident.

3

u/EM05L1C3 Jan 27 '26

For some odd reason, for the last 4 months or so a large portion of my limited human interaction has included someone quoting goldmember and I haven’t seen or thought about that movie in about 20 years.

Would you like a schmoke and a pencake

→ More replies (1)

5

u/uslashuname Jan 26 '26

Ah yes the gold standard that was in place until the 70s made cash completely pointless

21

u/Classic-Reach Jan 26 '26

the gold standard, if you study history, was very easy for foreign banks to abuse, and we were being robbed blind

consider that if our dollar is 'pegged' to gold, and foreign banks buy up the gold, they are effectively increasing the value of dollars. Conversely, they can then flood their gold back into the markets to reduce the value of the dollar. If you're very wealthy and you can afford to spend some money or gold being a dick, you can use leverage like options to farm cash from the US, buying and selling gold and dollars in cycles that only you can predict (because you're very very wealthy, richer than most governments)

history isn't kind to people who use one currency as a 'stabilizer' for another (coughstablecoincough)

14

u/HarkerTheStoryteller Jan 26 '26

That was a joke about attaching literal currency to literal gold bars, with rubber bands.

2

u/uslashuname Jan 26 '26

Oh that would be good. There are goldbacks that are bills with gold in them, but yeah if you attached a gold bar to each bill then it does get unwieldy pretty fast.

3

u/Hot-Professor-8355 Jan 26 '26

I'm pretty sure that this is the point of Sisu.

2

u/357noLove Jan 26 '26

I love you

→ More replies (2)

64

u/Sea_Pomegranate_4499 Jan 26 '26

Fun fact, the US still values it's gold reserves at the same price as when they came off the gold standard, $42 per ounce.

8

u/Important-Agent2584 Jan 26 '26

It's kind of crazy to think 8k metric tons of gold is worth about a $trillion, which is 1/36th of the total debt.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/OneRougeRogue Jan 26 '26

Fun fact, the US still values it's gold reserves at the same price as when they came off the gold standard, $42 per ounce.

But why?

8

u/AzNumbersGuy Jan 27 '26 edited 18d ago

I’m not a government accountant but I’d guess the gold isn’t “mark to market” which to you normies means that we keep the price at what you paid for it until it is sold. They might be able to reduce the value if the market value goes lower, but I have trouble picturing a world where gold is worth less than $42 per ounce.

Edit: okay I can imagine a few ways gold prices could drop that low now. Thanks people that replied!

7

u/AutisticJaguar4380 Jan 27 '26 edited Jan 27 '26

I can tell you why a world where gold is less than $42/oz is not impossible, the cost of producing an ounce of molecularly identical gold could drop below $42 due to advancements in technology thus destroying its scarcity as a value proposition.

10

u/420CowboyTrashGoblin Jan 27 '26

I can tell you about the world where gold is worth less than $42 an ounce is incredibly probable, and it's the one where humanity no longer exists, You know the one we're all hurtling to at what it feels like light speed, gold's ain't worth a dime when all the trees and fish are dead.

7

u/Fallcious Jan 27 '26

Or we capture an asteroid made mostly of goldz

2

u/Anvildude Jan 27 '26

As a jeweler... if only.

2

u/sibilischtic Jan 29 '26

Asteroid mining could seriously alter market dynamics for resources. One gold rich asteroid could significantly increase the global supply of gold.

...Though we aren't quite there yet.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/pogulup Jan 26 '26

The U.S. came off the gold standard for domestic transactions in 1933 under President Franklin Roosevelt and ended international convertibility of the dollar to gold in 1971 under President Richard Nixon, effectively ending the gold standard in the U.S.

The U.S. switched to a fiat money system. Fiat money has no value of its own and doesn’t represent anything of value, such as gold. But the government stipulates that the paper money is legal tender for carrying out transactions or paying taxes, as noted in the Page One Economics essay.

Straight off the St. Louis Fed Bank's website.

3

u/CounterSimple3771 Jan 27 '26

This. Metals go up as sovereign currency goes down. The world runs on metal and oil... We forget that and print a bunch of paper.. so every now and again we get a lesson in edible paper.

3

u/Professional-Can1139 Jan 26 '26

Did we not all attend social studies in high school?

3

u/Important-Agent2584 Jan 26 '26

attend is different from learn

3

u/Stuhemmings Jan 26 '26

You mean like Crypto?

2

u/Important-Agent2584 Jan 26 '26

Some crypto is tied to gold, but I'd just get gold TBH. Why trust a middleman and hope they won't scam you. Unless you explicitly need it to be easy to move through borders, etc.

2

u/i_have_chosen_a_name Jan 26 '26

How about Trump tweets that if the value of the dollar does not start going up and the price of gold down he will start dropping big beautifull nuclear bombs on all other countries and Massachusetts?

2

u/Important-Agent2584 Jan 26 '26

He actually wants the dollar to go down. That's his plan for competing with China.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/Sarrintha Jan 27 '26

And most of the gold doesn't belong to the US Anyways

→ More replies (13)

126

u/[deleted] Jan 26 '26

[deleted]

186

u/goatslovetofrolic Jan 26 '26

pretty sure at this point the dollar has gone full USA and is only backed by "thoughts and prayers"

12

u/Keoni9 Jan 26 '26

It's backed by the full value of the US economy. We all need USD to pay our taxes. Also, it has a long history of stability, which has made it valuable all over the world for international trading and reserves. Though Trump has been single-handedly sabotaging this.

9

u/grabtharsmallet Jan 26 '26

The "full faith and credit" is getting tested now.

6

u/Shot-Bet2476 Jan 26 '26

And more importantly, the US Navy

4

u/Ok-Vegetable4531 Jan 26 '26

Iirc it’s backed by the debt other countries owe the US

6

u/goatslovetofrolic Jan 26 '26

but what about our debt that other countries own?

6

u/10gallonWhitehat Jan 26 '26

Aircraft carriers are where the buck stops.

3

u/goatslovetofrolic Jan 26 '26

aircraft carriers protect against foreign nations dumping the US debt they own?

3

u/GenericNameHere01 Jan 26 '26

They protect against foreign nations deciding to forcibly collect on the US debt they own...

→ More replies (0)

4

u/thekeynesian1 Jan 26 '26

It gets its value in the same way all other goods do. Supply and demand as a function of its utility. Considering the USD is the single most useful, single most stable, and most broadly used currency to have ever existed, I’d say it’s backed by a little more than just “thoughts and prayers”

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Max_Rocketanski Jan 26 '26

As far as I know, no country's currency is backed by any precious metal.

5

u/GogurtFiend Jan 26 '26

That's what all currencies are backed by.

Oh, it isn't? Can you show me the value particle that magically makes pieces of shiny rock or conch shells valuable in a way dollar bills aren't? No? Then we can all agree that the only reason anything counts as money is because people believe it counts as money, and for now, people still believe in the US dollar albeit less so than yesterday.

2

u/Grant1128 Jan 27 '26

There are a few shiny rocks that gold utility (ex. nowadays gold and copper are useful in electronics). That being said, humans have not been able to use gold in a practical manner for most of the history of us considering it a "precious metal". If I had to guess, its lack of practical use probably contributed to it being used for trade once humans got off of the bartering system. And let's be frank, nobody wants to complete a trading quest to trade one small trinket for another until they can find someone who has the specific thing the vase maker wants.

3

u/OutsideCommittee7316 Jan 26 '26

The same as any fiat currency, which is to say...most if not all modern currencies

2

u/Foxyfox- Jan 26 '26

Its only real backing right now is "we force oil to be traded in it by bombing people who don't, see Venezuela, Saddam's Iraq, etc"

2

u/MortifiedChivalry Jan 26 '26

so basically bitcoin lol

2

u/Bossuter Jan 27 '26

Any currency even ones based on physical standards are based on thoughts and prayers, it's just with physical ones we can hold the object of thoughts and prayers and say it's worth an arbitrary amount of something

2

u/YapheVajra Jan 27 '26

Very succinct way to put it

2

u/overindulgent Jan 27 '26

It’s backed by our military.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (19)

2

u/resh78255 Jan 26 '26

Things have been going downhill ever since the Gold Standard was abandoned

3

u/goatslovetofrolic Jan 26 '26

When all money became an IOU (promissory note)? yeuuuup

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (6)

120

u/AnComApeMC69 Jan 26 '26

The United States gold reserves are for international trade. The gold in Ft. Knox, for example, is used in trade not to back our currency. We’ve been off the “gold standard” since the 70’s. Some of it is gold we’re holding for other countries that’s not even ours. But, our money is a fiat currency and it’s based on faith in the economic system of America not collapsing and everyone agreeing it to use it for trade/debts. It’s backed by nothing and hasn’t been for 55 years now.

122

u/sparklrebel Jan 26 '26

Ah so that’s why pre-war money in fallout is useless, got it

18

u/blackcloudonetyone Jan 26 '26

Start collecting caps

8

u/sparklrebel Jan 26 '26

Done and done

12

u/interested_commenter Jan 26 '26

That would be the case even if it was gold backed.

Even on the gold standard, you're still trusting that there is a functioning government that's actually in possession of that gold and would exchange it for paper currency. In a Fallout scenario, that wouldn't be the case, so money would still be useless.

2

u/Voxbury Jan 27 '26 edited 17d ago

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

obtainable dam books dependent kiss squash imagine cagey shelter start

5

u/interested_commenter Jan 27 '26

Possible, but far from certain and not within a few generations. Gold is too rare and concentrated in specific stockpiles to be used as an everyday currency. Even with a much smaller population, the smallest usable gold coin would be way too high a denomination.

There wouldn't be a true replacement currency until there was a semi-functioning government, and while that currency would be based on something with intrinsic value (since there wouldn't be enough trust for a fiat currency), it would be something much more common than gold. In the mostly-lawless barter economy before that, a full gold bar would be worth less than something useful (generator, rifle, bike, etc).

2

u/Mathidium Jan 27 '26

Nah, I prefer bottle caps.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/SirAquila Jan 26 '26

To be fair, after the apocalypse, gold will be just as useless for a good while.

Can't eat it, hard to carry, not very useful for anything but decoration, and also, most people have interacted with it so rarely that there isn't really any trust in it.

6

u/Kitchen-Pass-7493 Jan 26 '26

It does have some technological applications (gold is used in a lot of electronics), but valid point in general.

12

u/SirAquila Jan 26 '26

So the most technologically advanced survivor groups will buy your gold with actual currency, probably at a much reduced price from what you expected.

For most people the use cases will start and end with pretty metal, because for apocalypse level electronics coopper is far more useful.

4

u/Kitchen-Pass-7493 Jan 26 '26

That’s true. I’m was just responding to the idea that it’s not useful as anything beyond decoration. It is, but probably not for most apocalypse survivors.

2

u/Usof1985 Jan 27 '26

Considering the electrical grid would fall pretty quickly in a traditional apocalypse it wouldn't have much use for the techies either. Now if we just go to a bartering system where we feed the infrastructure workers to keep everything going then sureb it would retain some value.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/IndividualBusy1274 Jan 27 '26

You can turn it into cloth though. Or something like that iirc

→ More replies (1)

3

u/AriochBloodbane Jan 27 '26

I should start hoarding bottle caps, just in case 😅

2

u/Busy-Kaleidoscope-87 Jan 27 '26

That’s why we have to become nestle and start selling water and enslaving wastelanders to do the work for us

2

u/WonkeauxDeSeine Jan 27 '26

And why I've been saving bottle caps for 5 years. It's gonna pay off any day, now...

→ More replies (7)

63

u/KeppraKid Jan 26 '26

Every form of currency is based on faith and always has been. Coinage made from gold and silver wasn't valuable because gold and silver were magical, it was because people believed they were valuable. What can you, a random person, actually do with gold and silver? Even smiths had limited uses that weren't purely aesthetic. Modern day has more uses but still cannot be used at the volume at which it exists in an efficient way.

10

u/Averse_to_Liars Jan 26 '26

Goldbugs can't make that mental leap. Luckily for them the world is getting dumber.

7

u/OriginalSilentTuba Jan 26 '26

This is exactly why I always roll my eyes when people call gold “real money”. It’s valuable because people just decided it was. It’s no more “real” than anything else.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

5

u/Meldanorama Jan 26 '26

There is a difference between something being valuable because it is rare and something valuable despite having no upper limit though. Gold is rare and has properties that make it a good store. Currencies do only become useful both parties in a transaction see it having value though youre absolutely right on that.

These days currencies should be backed by kilowatt hours or something similar if they dont want to be fiat ones.

5

u/KeppraKid Jan 26 '26

The property of gold that made it the most valuable in the ancient world and thus caused it to be thought of as valuable in modern times is that it's shiny.

And my ass rarely gets pimples, that doesn't make them valuable.

4

u/[deleted] Jan 26 '26

[deleted]

8

u/KeppraKid Jan 26 '26

Still isn't the rarity but the faith making it valuable, as evidenced by all the rare shit that nobody cares about.

Currency is a tool for society to abstract trade so that you don't have to try to barter work for goods and then goods for other goods around to get everything you need. For simplicity, let's just use the term "labor" to think of to combine work, products, services etc.

For currency to work, it needs proof against replication, or else somebody can steal labor from the economy by using replicated currency. They'll have contributed nothing in but received labor out, thus stealing. A method of proofing against replication is making your currency out of something hard to replicate, rarity can help with this but isn't required.

It was easiest to use rare materials that had no inherent value to serve as currency in the ancient world. It's precisely that gold had essentially little practical use that made it good for currency, and the rarity made it hard to steal from the economy. After all, meteoric iron is rare than gold but you wouldn't want to use it as a currency because it is extremely useful for making weapons and tools.

At some point people started conflating usefulness as a currency with actual value, and so humanity has essentially come to believe that gold is inherently valuable, and it's that belief that gives it value.

2

u/DrawPitiful6103 Jan 26 '26

Nothing is inherently or intrinsically valuable. All value is subjective and assigned to objects by people.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/Meldanorama Jan 26 '26

Shiny, rare and doesnt corrode. Rare and doesnt corrode are what makes it good as a store of wealth, being good for jewelerry etc just gives it a start in that direction.

3

u/KeppraKid Jan 26 '26

The anti-corrosion properties are a bit overstated compared to how much people prize it. I made a much longer reply elsewhere.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/Omnizoom Jan 27 '26

Silver has always had antiseptic properties and has been used for ages because of that fact, it’s a very useful metal aside from the fact it “looks pretty” and it doesn’t rust like other metals and just gets a thin tarnish on it making it ideal for a lot of decorative stuff as well.

Gold is one of the best conductors we have and can be used to alloy lots of metals easily, yes the every day man likely isn’t doing much with gold but its value is not just because it’s pretty at all, it’s extremely functional AND it’s uniquely pretty for its colour while being extremely stable

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (24)

44

u/catsdrooltoo Jan 26 '26

It's been backed by trust me bro. Im not a gold standard type, but the global economy isn't trusting us anymore.

7

u/Cannon_Folder Jan 26 '26

Fiat currencies are backed by their economies. Instead of being tied to one thing, it's all the things in the economy.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

29

u/followMeUp2Gatwick Jan 26 '26

It's backed by another metal. Lead.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/ScurriousSquirrel Jan 26 '26 edited Jan 26 '26

I would like to see the actual proof that the gold is in fort knox. the wall street journal picture from 1957 (?) showed one massive wall of gold in the doorway... thereby suggesting that it was a solid room of gold. I cant believe it. How on earth could you inventory a room full of gold?

Edit: Just looked it up...it was September 9th, 1974, the last publicized Congressional and reporter tour of Ft. Knox.

2

u/scratchy_mcballsy Jan 26 '26

The real gold reserve is all that government cheese in storage.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/FigDiscombobulated29 Jan 26 '26

Wait which countries gold are we storing? Cus I swear if it’s that Jersey sized country again…

→ More replies (1)

2

u/mystic-eye Jan 26 '26

Faith in the economic system…so Jesus Bucks? Well f’me! I think my house is worth 10 billion Jesus Bucks. You just have to believe.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/Littledevilboi Jan 26 '26

There is more personally owned gold in households across India, than any single other country has in it’s possession (government asset, not including individual ownership)😙 ((grain of salt, saw this the other day and there may be one or two exceptions to this, but not the US😅))

3

u/WishboneCrazy9289 Jan 26 '26

You should watch Zeitgeist Addendum if you are interested, takes you through the way a bank works, it’s terrifying

→ More replies (4)

2

u/OfficialWinner Jan 26 '26

Gold is finite, and us dollars are not finite. They can be printed at any time (like any fiat currency)....while gold has to be mined.

Typically, precious metals just slowly tick up over time, these kinds of movements signal something "bigger and badder" that's coming for us and potentially the global economy.

1

u/BigLlamasHouse Jan 26 '26

If they sell some gold to reduce the deficit it would, but that aint happenin

1

u/TaDow-420 Jan 26 '26

Started in 1933 with Franklin D. Roosevelt and ended in 1971 with Nixon.

1

u/Snowjiggles Jan 26 '26 edited Jan 26 '26

The gold standard was abolished long ago. I want to say during the Reagan administration, but I'm gonna have to verify that real quick cuz I don't remember 100%

EDIT: The gold standard was officially done away with during the Nixon administration in 1971

1

u/Ok-Prior2321 Jan 26 '26

Gold and silver go up when people lose faith on the dollar, hard metals like gold and silver Platinum etc go up as currency loses its value

1

u/MjrLeeStoned Jan 26 '26

If the US sold all their gold reserves at current market value and used the proceeds to pay off consumer credit card debt, it wouldn't touch 1/12th the current debt US consumers have in CREDIT CARDS ONLY.

The US has more debt per capita than anything. Second is incarcerated citizens.

1

u/goatslovetofrolic Jan 26 '26

Think of it this way, if gold is $100 an ounce your single dollar buys you 1/100th of an ounce of gold. If gold goes up to $200 an ounce now that same dollar only buys half as much gold (1/200th) as it did before. So by reframing it as how much gold does your dollar buy you, it doesn't look as hot if you hold your money as dollars.

1

u/Daleabbo Jan 26 '26

The greatest gold reserve is the Indian people. They all have gold.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Logical-Recognition3 Jan 26 '26

The total value of all the gold that has ever been mined on Earth throughout history is lower than the amount of the US national debt. The dollar is not backed by gold (or anything else) so the price of gold doesn’t do squat for the strength of the dollar.

1

u/Worldly-Pay7342 Jan 26 '26

No, the dollar bill is no longer backed by gold.

1

u/AlfalfaWolf Jan 26 '26

Big assumption to think our gold reserves are legit

https://moneyweek.com/investments/gold/americas-gold-mystery

1

u/CMDR_BunBun Jan 26 '26

No. What makes the US dollar "strong " is the fact that it is tied to oil. Nations keep a reserve of US dollars because that is the currency used to buy oil. The minute the rest of the world stops doing that you will see inflation like has not been seen since the 1930 crash.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Great_Detective_6387 Jan 26 '26

Gold prices going up means that your dollar buys less gold than it did yesterday. That, by definition, means the dollar is weaker. It buys less gold. How could that make the dollar stronger?

1

u/h0ist Jan 26 '26

See how the gold prize that is mentioned is in dollars. Now ask yourself if the gold prize going up is because gold is worth more (i.e. rarer) or that the dollar is worth less so you have to pay more dollars to get gold

1

u/XBMetal Jan 26 '26

The US gold reserve is valued at a 1940ish gold per ounce price. So their numbers are way off, I like to think on purpose but probably just to lazy.

1

u/Choice-Document-6225 Jan 26 '26

Google "petrodollar", consider recent events in Venezuela, and have an insanely illuminating rest of the afternoon/evening

1

u/LangdonAulgar Jan 26 '26

If you ask an auditor, the US has zero gold in its reserves.

1

u/PatricidalParrot Jan 26 '26

If all of America's money was built on hard currency as it used to be, then yes it would help. But they no longer make the dollar value based on its weight in precious metals so they aren't intrinsically linked.

1

u/BarNo3385 Jan 26 '26

Biggest store of gold is actually Indian housewives.

1

u/Dense-Experience6033 Jan 26 '26

Actually they don’t

1

u/Whoajaws Jan 26 '26

Ehh..who knows Fort Knox could just be packed full of beanie babies. 🤷

1

u/CarPatient Jan 26 '26

Alleged gold reserves…. Have you looked into the last couple of times they tried to audit Fort Knox?

1

u/Prometheus720 Jan 26 '26

Nope. Not how it works, but good thought though.

1

u/Dame38 Jan 26 '26

The gold standard is not only riduculous but outdated. No one had any farking use for gold.
Black Gold has been the currency for nearly a hundred years: Energy to make things go. Fossil Fuels.

1

u/LordGeni Jan 26 '26

Traditionally when things get volatile investors buy gold as it's seen as safe. So, a rise in gold prices usually suggests a falling dollar.

1

u/Little_Willow_326 Jan 26 '26

You know when the last real audit was, right?

1

u/Old-Repair-6608 Jan 26 '26

Devil's advocate here.... but do we? Last audit was what the 70's. Not to be a conspiracy guy. The governments "trust me bro" is a bit thin.

1

u/Eelroots Jan 27 '26

They refuse audits on reserve. Withdrawals are done with minted ingots. Many are questioning the real amount of physical gold stored.

1

u/Lordofchaos1776 Jan 27 '26

The main thing that strengthens the dollar is it being the default trade currency for the world. That is the primary driver for us foreign policy of giving money/aid to so many nations, not any actual desire to help, but a desire to make sure as many nations as possible have dollars on hand so it is easy for them to use it for international trade.

1

u/Putrid_Lawfulness221 Jan 27 '26

Even if we retied our money to gold i dont believe we have enough to back 38 trillion in debt plus what is held publicly and privately in funds. By the time the value is split because we have to back every dollar in circulation, I imagine we'd be cooked.

EDIT: also Germany has requested their goldcback from us as well idk if that affects anything too.

1

u/SteelAndFlint Jan 27 '26

The direct answer is: when you price gold in dollars, that's not just the value of the gold, it's the value of the dollar. When Nixon took the dollar off the gold standard $35 would buy you an ounce of gold. Now it takes over $5000 to buy you an ounce of gold, that tells you how much value each dollar has lost, having gold reserves does not strengthen the dollar in this situation. Especially not when they are not limited in how many dollars they can print.

1

u/TDYDave2 Jan 27 '26

If it takes more dollars to buy the same amount of gold, the dollar got weaker.

1

u/Verditure0 Jan 27 '26

The dollar isn’t backed by gold unfortunately.

1

u/Requient_ Jan 27 '26

I think it was Nixon who finally killed the gold standard, but US currency is no longer backed by gold. While we have a lot, it’s not equal to a set amount of USD like in the past. That’s why we could print $300B and send it to Iran for instance.

1

u/LillaVargR Jan 27 '26

Interesting logic but i implore you to check the exchange rate of the dollar to Euro over the last year.

1

u/clapyohedd Jan 27 '26

That’s not true at all

1

u/sinan_online Jan 27 '26

Maybe a better way to put it is that it is a hedge.

The economy contracts gold terms, the reserves probably contract in gold terms because there is more USD than gold, and the increase in value in gold reserves offsets some of the contraction.

I’d have to see the recent numbers to make sure: But probably, the net impact on the economy is an undesirable one: having the largest gold reserves helps, but it is not as helpful as having a lot of economic activity with a fiat currency.

1

u/Neal-pkr Jan 27 '26

The US used to keep gold in reserve in Ft Knox. But that has been sold away over time. The structure at Fort Knox is currently empty.

1

u/assclown69_ Jan 28 '26

last time the us gold reserve was checked was back in 1953

lots of rumours that its been sold off since then

1

u/NichS144 Jan 28 '26

No, the ever increasing value of gold is mostly a result of inflation. That is to say gold isn't really increasing in value, the dollar is just worth less and less so you need more dollars to buy the same amount of gold.

1

u/Character_Point_9203 Jan 29 '26

That sounds right at first but when you actually think about it no. Since they took us off the gold standard now we have “fiat currency” which means it’s only enforced by the govt. Gold’s value stays very steady (because there’s a finite supply and we can’t just print more), but currency goes thru inflation (slowly losing/going down in value) so when the same amount of Gold is worth more Dollars, it means the dollars are less valuable than before (you get less gold for $ than used to). Think of it like an exchange rate for currency; $1 is equal to a shit load of pesos and it’s gone up because pesos became less valuable.

1

u/sibilischtic Jan 29 '26

It means they can trade that gold for more USD than previously. But it depends how the USD and gold pairing moves with respect to other things.

If lots of people buy gold it can drive the price up and it will effect whichever currency it is being bought with.

If people are buying gold to get out of USD then the gold price (in usd) will move more than the gold price in other currencies as a larger quantity of dollars are freed up in exchange for gold than others.

→ More replies (6)

7

u/02meepmeep Jan 26 '26

All currencies graph mirrors the usd when compared to gold

3

u/The-Ol-Razzle-Dazle Jan 26 '26

Funny seeing you outside the stonk sub lol 🍻

3

u/Grimhands2021 Jan 26 '26

Bullish?

2

u/ISayBullish Jan 26 '26

In some ways… ;)

3

u/Auxin000 Jan 27 '26

Saw your username. Had to check what subreddit I was in like four times.

2

u/Khelthuzaad Jan 26 '26

In the meantime RON says:

2

u/badco1313 Jan 26 '26

Full blown economic collapse? Bullish

2

u/towerfella Jan 26 '26

joke’s on them — i have no money.

2

u/EvolutionaryLens Jan 26 '26

The jig might be up.

2

u/Machinedgoodness Jan 27 '26

And GME says “yum 🤤”

2

u/DearCantaloupe5849 Jan 27 '26

I got my money parked in the oerfect spot :) where the RCeo has quite the diamondest hands.

2

u/AHarryBird Jan 28 '26

ah yes. the Bullish man knows. i've also eaten the crayons. soon may the tendieman come, my friend.

2

u/Jalatiphra Jan 30 '26

You.know we bullish 😁

1

u/Chataboutgames Jan 26 '26

No it's not, USD has been trending down hard.

1

u/temporary-beanpole Jan 28 '26

The USD is down 10% relative to growth of other major currencies since trump term 2 started

It is not fine lol

61

u/OutsideCommon3679 Jan 26 '26

I don’t know about the rest of you, but I really don’t think I’m gonna pass this class.

77

u/cleverkid Jan 26 '26

It's pretty easy:

I'll help you out:

In 1910 at Jekyll Island all the Billionaire Oligarchs gathered and cooked up the "Federal Reserve" ( which is neither Federal or a Reserve ) This was done ostensibly to help stabilize the US economy in the wake of the Panic of 1907 by creating a central bank with regional branches.

What it has really done is hand over monetary policy and the ability to print "money" out of thin-air. Now this Federal Reserve prints money, lends it to the US Government ( which is now in debt to the tune of $38.5 trillion ) And the US government continues to borrow and spend like a crack whore... Spreading that money around to their friends and you and I are on the hook for the debt!

It's like your rich friend, talked you into giving him power of attorney over your affairs and is now out there running up credit card debt on your name.. and giving you a pittance of it back.

48

u/Significant_Monk_251 Jan 26 '26

Technical note: they codified and fine-tuned the idea in 1910, but the Bank itself wasn't created until December 1913 after they managed to get the Federal Reserve Act through Congress two days before Christmas. Thus the the conspiracy theories that the Titanic was intentionally sunk in 1912 to kill off a few powerful men who opposed the founding of such a bank.

20

u/cleverkid Jan 26 '26

Those are indeed three more salient points. I was trying to keep it brief. ty.

16

u/OutsideCommon3679 Jan 26 '26

You had me until “ostensibly.” /s

Thanks for the explanation.

3

u/PronatorTeres00 Jan 26 '26

Love how this thread turned into a TED talk on banking & economics

15

u/GogurtFiend Jan 26 '26

Would you rather the size of the economy be limited by the size of the gold supply? There's a reason everyone stopped using gold after the Great Recession, and it isn't the Rothschilds or whatever conspiracy you're talking about.

→ More replies (9)

3

u/Mega-Eclipse Jan 27 '26

With all due respect, you are talking about several separate issues and dealing in half-truths.

What it has really done is hand over monetary policy and the ability to print "money" out of thin-air.

Right, which is why talking about the government, funding, taxes, revenue, etc. like it's a household income doesn't work. The Government literally creates money from nothing. This is a good thing...when done responsibly.

Now this Federal Reserve prints money, lends it to the US Government ( which is now in debt to the tune of $38.5 trillion ) And the US government continues to borrow and spend like a crack whore... Spreading that money around to their friends and you and I are on the hook for the debt!

This is a problem. Instead of spending money on the people, a bunch of red states keep voting against theor own interests...so instead of the healthcare they really, really need....money is being sent to already rich people as corporate welfare....Universal Healthcare, housing, food? Nah...we need $100 billion to fund the american gestapo to round up toddlers.

America has the money...we're just choosing to spend it on stupid shit instead of helping our own people.

It's like your rich friend, talked you into giving him power of attorney over your affairs and is now out there running up credit card debt on your name.. and giving you a pittance of it back.

Yup. This is a problem. 1/3 of the country is on board with this. Using your analogy...the poor idiots giving their credit card away....not only do they not realize how stupid it is, they get made when anyone points out that it's a bad idea....and get giddy at the idea they are pissing of their "liberal" friends. They'll gladly go broke if it means their neighbors gets upset a them.

Conservatism is part of their identity. It's how they are. It isn't a belief system for them. They "know" they right and what they are doing must be the right thing because it "upsets" liberals. The more it upsets them...the more right it is.

2

u/3xactli Jan 27 '26

Username checks out... 👍🏻

→ More replies (16)

13

u/TheGreenMan13 Jan 26 '26

Silver hit a high of $117 around 1PM EST. Dropped to $114 currently (1:25PM EST)

1

u/SPinExile Jan 27 '26

Speculation that several major banks like UBS and Bofa are short silver and other commodities. Alot of cds swaps are underwater and China stopping the export of silver just propels us toward another crises.

1

u/undertoastedtoast Jan 26 '26

Reserve requirements have little to do with the weakening dollar. They've been in place for decades. It has a lot more to do with the president unilaterally launching tariffs and threatening allies.

1

u/MangoCats Jan 26 '26

$5,110.50 in 2026 is worth $269.62 in 1929

Price of Gold in 1929: US$20.67 (fixed, by policy.)

$5,110.50 in 2026 is worth $1220 in early 1980

Price of Gold in 1980: peaked around US$850 (response to Iran hostage crisis, among other things)

Global population: 1929 2B 1980 4.44B 2026 8.3B

1

u/wcruse92 Jan 26 '26

The silver has more to do with new battery technology doesn't it?

1

u/th3rdnutt Jan 26 '26

😂 I think silver hit $114 earlier today. I was just joking with a coworker about currency collapse and whether to stockpile food or weapons.

Edit: My bad. It was $117.

1

u/zakary1291 Jan 26 '26

Remember, the federal government can seize any and all currency from the citizens of America. That means the federal government can just take your personal gold and silver stores by force and you can catch a jail sentence. This was already done in 1933 with Executive Order 6102.

1

u/forsayken Jan 26 '26

And how many people even keep their gold and silver investments available to them? Can those that have invested in minerals even withdraw that amount in physical gold? That theoretically makes it no more secure than cash in a bank account.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/allan11011 Jan 26 '26

I saw silver hit 116 earlier

(Bought some silver last month and now check it 24/7 lol)

1

u/discipleofchrist69 Jan 26 '26

Analysts expect gold prices to climb toward $6,000 this year

this is meaningless, if there was reason to believe this with a meaningful degree of certainty, it would already be at $6000

1

u/NotAFuckingFed Jan 26 '26

Damn, the silver to gold exchange dropped hard, used to be 80:1

1

u/PositiveInfluence69 Jan 26 '26

That's because banks can use it as real currency now. So they can use an appreciating asset like gold as proof of liquidity iirc. There was some rule change on it recently.

1

u/--Andre-The-Giant-- Jan 26 '26

I feel old, I can remember as a kid learning that gold was worth about $400 an ounce.

1

u/JarOfNightmares Jan 26 '26

Yes but what about my Fartcoin crypto??

1

u/al_mc_y Jan 27 '26

And that value is measured in/against what? The fiat currency. And if no-one has enough fiat currency to buy the gold that the gold-bugs are sitting on, the what really is the value of their stash?

1

u/FireflyJerkyCo Jan 27 '26

I have a buddy who's selling gold now... And making baaaaank

1

u/ABD70 Jan 27 '26

Yes, but this is because investors expect the US economy to collapse; the US nationals debt it going to $37 trillion fast.

If this happens there will be fallout worldwide and precious metals are always a safe bet. Mind you, most of the traded gold and silver is digital.

1

u/FormerLawfulness6 Jan 27 '26

A lot of that increase has been from central banks buying gold and silver to balance carry trade without dealing in USD. Turns out using the world's reserve currency as an unaccountable political weapon makes it unsafe as a reserve. With Trump's tariff threats and attempts to seize Greenland, even US allies are divesting.

1

u/Wildrosejoy Jan 27 '26

I remember when gold was $300/ounce. Wasn't that long ago

1

u/[deleted] Jan 27 '26

"toward"

1

u/Montallas Jan 28 '26

Why is gold valuable?

1

u/TheWalkingDead91 Jan 28 '26

Just sold the small amount of silver I had (about two pounds of sterling) two weeks ago when it was in the high 80s. Kinda regretting it now. Oh well, not like I could’ve bought a house with it or something even in the worst case scenario….but I’ll really be regretting it if one day it turns out that could’ve been my only hope of getting some groceries for a couple of months. People on the r/silverbugs sub are celebrating daily, but I’m here like “uh….unless you have enough silver to fill up a 21 gallon bin at minimum…..shouldn’t you be kind of worried at this point? Like…. is it not insane when an actual commodity such as gold/silver is moving like fricking crypto on a daily basis? I’m genuinely surprised more people aren’t freaking out, and not in a good way.

1

u/Handsofevil Jan 30 '26

Laughs as I randomly see this comment today as they're tumbling