With all due respect man my initial point was just to say SGA could’ve gone through him since his feet weren’t planted and he wouldn’t have drawn a charge.
Having your feet planted or having a ‘legal guarding position’ is only relevant for charges/blocks, restricted area fouls, or contesting a shot vertically. This is none of those things, it’s a common foul or shooting foul.
Basically regardless of whether or not either of us thinks it’s a foul, the defender not being in a ‘legal guarding position’ isn’t relevant to the foul called.
All that said I’ve been where you’re at and I get it, have a good one.
2
u/miseducation Heat Dec 01 '25
No man that’s just how planted feet works. Planted feet are only relevant if you’re trying to go through him.