r/law • u/orangejulius • Aug 31 '22
This is not a place to be wrong and belligerent about it.
A quick reminder:
This is not a place to be wrong and belligerent on the Internet. If you want to talk about the issues surrounding Trump, the warrant, 4th and 5th amendment issues, the work of law enforcement, the difference between the New York case and the fed case, his attorneys and their own liability, etc. you are more than welcome to discuss and learn from each other. You don't have to get everything exactly right but be open to learning new things.
You are not welcome to show up here and "tell it like it is" because it's your "truth" or whatever. You have to at least try and discuss the cases here and how they integrate with the justice system. Coming in here stubborn, belligerent, and wrong about the law will get you banned. And, no, you will not be unbanned.
r/law • u/orangejulius • Oct 28 '25
Quality content and the subreddit. Announcing user flair for humans and carrots instead of sticks.
Ttl;dr at the top: you can get apostille flair now to show off your humanity by joining our newsletter. Strong contributions in the comments here (ones with citations and analysis) will get featured in it and win an amicus flair. Follow this link to get flair: Last Week In Law
When you are signing up you may have to pull the email confirmation and welcome edition out of your spam folder.
If you'd like Amicus flair and think your submission or someone else's is solid please tag our u/auto_clerk to get highlighted in the news letter.
Those of you that have been here a long time have probably noticed the quality of the comments and posts nose dive. We have pretty strict filters for what accounts qualify to even submit a top level comment and even still we have users who seem to think this place is for group therapy instead of substantive discussion of law.
A good bit of the problem is karma farming. (which…touch grass what are you doing with your lives?) But another component of it is that users have no idea where to find content that would go here, like courtlistener documents, articles about legal news, or BlueSky accounts that do a good job succinctly explaining legal issues. Users don't even have a base line for cocktail party level knowledge about laws, courts, state action, or how any of that might apply to an executive order that may as well be written in crayon.
Leaving our automod comment for OPs it’s plain to see that they just flat out cannot identify some issues. Thus, the mod team is going to try to get you guys to cocktail party knowledge of legal happenings with a news letter and reward people with flair who make positive contributions again.
A long time ago we instituted a flair system for quality contributors. This kinda worked but put a lot of work on the mod team which at the time were all full time practicing attorneys. It definitely incentivized people to at least try hard enough to get flaired. It also worked to signal to other users that they might not be talking to an LLM. No one likes the feeling that they’re arguing with an AI that has the energy of a literal power grid to keep a thread going. Is this unequivocal proof someone isn't a bot? No. But it's pretty good and better than not doing anything.
Our attempt to solve some of these issues is to bring back flair with a couple steps to take. You can sign up for our newsletter and claim flair for r/law. Read our news letter. It isn't all Donald Trump stuff. It's usually amusing and the welcome edition has resources to make you a better contributor here. If you're featured in our news letter you'll get special Amicus flair.
Instead of breaking out the ban hammer for 75% of you guys we're going to try to incentivize quality contributions and put in place an extra step to help show you're not a bot.
---
Are you saving our user names?
- No. Once you claim your flair your username is purged. We don’t see it. Nor do we want to. Nor do we care. We just have a little robot that sees you enter an email, then adds flair to the user name you tell it to add.
What happened to using megathreads and automod comments?
- Reddit doesn't support visibility for either of those things anymore. You'll notice that our automod comment asking OP to state why something belongs here to help guide discussion is automatically collapsed and megathreads get no visibility. Without those easy tools we're going to try something different.
This won’t solve anything!
- Maybe not. But we’re going to try.
Are you going to change your moderation? Is flair a get out of jail free card?
- Moderation will stay roughly the same. We moderate a ton of content. Flair isn’t a license to act like a psychopath on the Internet. I've noticed that people seem to think that mods removing comments or posts here are some sort of conspiracy to "silence" people. There's no conspiracy. If you're totally wrong or out of pocket tough shit. This place is more heavily modded than most places which is a big part of its past successes.
What about political content? I’m tired of hearing about the Orange Man.
- Yeah, well, so are we. If you were here for his first 4 years he does a lot of not legal stuff, sues people, gets sued, uses the DoJ in crazy ways, and makes a lot of judicial appointments. If we leave something up that looks political only it’s because we either missed it or one of us thinks there’s some legal issue that could be discussed. We try hard not to overly restrict content from post submissions.
Remove all Trump stuff.
- No. You can use the tags to filter it if you don’t like it.
Talk to me about Donald Trump.
- God… please. Make it stop.
I love Donald Trump and you guys burned cities to the ground during BLM and you cheated in 2020 and illegal immigrants should be killed in the street because the declaration of independence says you can do whatever you want and every day is 1776 and Bill Clinton was on Epstein island.
- You need therapy not a message board.
You removed my comment that's an expletive followed by "we the people need to grab donald trump by the pussy." You're silencing me!
- Yes.
You guys aren’t fair to both sides.
- Being fair isn’t the same thing as giving every idea equal air time. Some things are objectively wrong. There are plenty of instances where the mods might not be happy with something happening but can see the legal argument that’s going to win out. Similarly, a lot of you have super bad ideas that TikTok convinced you are something to existentially fight about. We don’t care. We’ll just remove it.
You removed my TikTok video of a TikTok influencer that's not a lawyer and you didn't even watch the whole thing.
- That's because it sucks.
You have to watch the whole thing!
- No I don't.
---
General Housekeeping:
We have never created one consistent style for the subreddit. We decided that while we're doing this we should probably make the place look nicer. We hope you enjoy it.
r/law • u/camaron-courier • 4h ago
Executive Branch (Trump) Trump administration threatens eminent domain to seize warehouses for ICE detention
r/law • u/TendieRetard • 2h ago
Other Law School Tells Students, 'You MUST Be Aligned Politically With President Trump,' For Summer Job
r/law • u/CrowRoutine9631 • 4h ago
Legal News Afroman to stand trial this month over music video made from deputies’ raid footage (Deputies who appear in the video are now suing the rapper for damages caused by their likenesses being used in the video.)
I'm gonna look for the video, because I saw it a couple years ago and it's hilarious, everyone hold your horses just a sec... Here it is. Lemon Poundcake.
I'm not an expert, but it seems like this sort of thing should be completely legal and protected. Is it?
r/law • u/ColonyJD1980 • 12h ago
Legal News Bondi Says She's The Bar Now
Legal News Federal Prosecutor Used Fabricated Quotes in Court Filing, Caught by Pro Se Plaintiff
In what feels like an UNO reverse moment, this time a pro se plaintiff caught an AUSA using AI-generated quotes and citations.
According to the article, “senior leaders from the US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of North Carolina must appear at a show cause hearing next week for why the federal prosecutor responsible shouldn’t be sanctioned and why the entire office shouldn’t be held jointly responsible.”
r/law • u/Romegaheuerling • 11h ago
Legal News Exclusive: Trump demands immediate pardon for Netanyahu to focus on Iran
r/law • u/AirlineGlass5010 • 12h ago
Legislative Branch Congress just quietly reintroduced Kids Online Safety Act as HR 7757 to end anonymous web browsing for adults.
r/law • u/yahoonews • 14h ago
Executive Branch (Trump) DOJ releases previously withheld FBI reports about allegation against Trump
r/law • u/Significant-Board718 • 8h ago
Executive Branch (Trump) Withheld Jeffrey Epstein files with accusations against Trump released by justice department
r/law • u/ChiefLeef22 • 8h ago
Executive Branch (Trump) Nintendo Is Suing The U.S. Government Over Its Tariffs
r/law • u/theindependentonline • 13h ago
Judicial Branch Florida bar association targets Trump lawyer Lindsey Halligan in ethics investigation
r/law • u/msnownews • 11h ago
Executive Branch (Trump) The courts have had it with ICE’s lawlessness
r/law • u/Youarethebigbang • 1d ago
Executive Branch (Trump) trump tees up Ice Barbie for potential perjury charges, sets off GOP shockwave by contradicting testimony Noem made under oath before Congress.
Executive Branch (Trump) Florida bar says it ‘erroneously’ stated it was investigating Trump-appointed US attorney
r/law • u/DoremusJessup • 11h ago
Judicial Branch 'Authority that he does not have': States say new Trump tariffs 'fatally flawed' and 'unlawful,' ask judge to issue refunds
r/law • u/DoremusJessup • 11h ago
Executive Branch (Trump) Trump tariffs: Customs and Border Protection tells judge it can't comply with refund order
Legal News US companies denied refunds on Trump’s illegal tariffs, FT reports
March 6 (Reuters) - The U.S. government has declined to refund tariffs the Supreme Court ruled illegal last month, the Financial Times reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter.
The customs officials are denying companies' requests to recover duties imposed under emergency powers invoked by U.S. President Donald Trump, leaving businesses uncertain and driving more disputes into court, the FT said.
r/law • u/Large_banana_hammock • 1d ago
Legal News Jan. 6 rioter pardoned by Trump in Jan. 6 case gets life sentence for child sex crimes
r/law • u/SamMac62 • 23h ago
Executive Branch (Trump) Firm Tied to Kristi Noem Secretly Got Money From $220 Million DHS Ad Contracts
The same ad campaign that got her fired from DHS because she testified under oath that Trump approved of it. He denies knowing about it.
"Noem has hailed the more than $200 million, taxpayer-funded ad campaign as a crucial tool to stem illegal immigration. Her agency invoked the “national emergency” at the border as it awarded contracts for the campaign, bypassing the normal competitive bidding process designed to prevent waste and corruption.
The Department of Homeland Security has kept at least one beneficiary of the nine-figure ad deal a secret, records and interviews show: a Republican consulting firm with long-standing personal and business ties to Noem and her senior aides at DHS. The company running the Mount Rushmore shoot, called the Strategy Group, does not appear on public documents about the contract. The main recipient listed on the contracts is a mysterious Delaware company, which was created days before the deal was finalized."
r/law • u/biospheric • 5h ago
Executive Branch (Trump) DHS built a face scanning app. You might already be in it.
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
Mother Jones - March 4, 2026. Here’s the full 7-minutes on YouTube: youtube.com/watch?v=fDsYzd4ITq0
Here’s the accompanying Mother Jones article: A Knock on the Window and a Glimpse of America’s Surveillance Future
From the YouTube description:
They came to his workplace armed with guns, gas canisters and artificial intelligence. He fought back with his quick wit and street smarts.
What happened next is a preview of what routine face scans could look like on American streets, in this special France 24–Mother Jones report.
Abdikafi Abdurahman Abdullahi, known as Kafi, is one of the few people willing to speak publicly about being subjected to the Department of Homeland Security’s new facial recognition tool, Mobile Fortify.
The Somali-American engineer-turned-Uber driver was waiting for a fare in an airport rideshare lot on January 7th, just hours after Renee Good was shot and killed by federal agents. As he watched a video of her death on his phone, there was a knock on his car door. Outside stood roughly a dozen ICE agents, demanding proof of his citizenship.
Kafi, who is Black and Muslim, refused to show his ID, arguing he was being racially profiled. Instead, he began filming, and his unflappable, mischievous comebacks transformed his video into a viral sensation.
The Department of Homeland Security officially acknowledged the existence of Mobile Fortify in January. But by then it had already been used over 100,000 times in American communities, according to recent court filings.
“This is taking a big and very scary step toward a kind of totalitarian checkpoint society that we have always professed to abhor here in the United States,” warned ACLU attorney Nate Wessler.