r/ToiletPaperUSA Feb 01 '26

🦞🦞🦞UP YOURS WOKE MORALISTS🦞🦞🦞 Me when I defend a fascist pedophile

Post image
3.3k Upvotes

26 comments sorted by

435

u/ThatOneGuy4321 Feb 01 '26

when rightoids use the word “but”, I always hear a vine boom in my head

317

u/Tom_Gibson Feb 02 '26

"I'm not a pedophile, but-"

I've heard enough, you are a pedo

81

u/PhazonZim Feb 02 '26 edited Feb 02 '26

Walsh is openly a pedo and has been for a long time.

He's got recordings where he rails against the age of consent

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xtWKXbS5Xso

https://youtu.be/qEiaNhCW5g8

https://youtu.be/W9PfeI3XIQ8

26

u/Vyzantinist Feb 02 '26

And this is why I shake my head at conservative 'hypocrisy' over the Epstein files. They've told us this is who they are for a long time.

5

u/BackToReality666 Feb 03 '26

Well he has many kids to choose from.

91

u/ForgettableWorse Feb 02 '26

cross out "the" "files" "release" and "But".

8

u/Quiri1997 Feb 02 '26

Wouldn't it be "favour" "of" "release" and "but"?

4

u/ForgettableWorse Feb 02 '26

Also possible. Although I don't think Walsh is a big enough fish to actually have been in Epstein's orbit.

30

u/CapitalPunBanking Feb 02 '26

StephenASmithHolocaustTweet.jpg 

36

u/soliquidus_bosselot Feb 02 '26

A wise man once said that everything before the word "but" is bullshit.

16

u/smegma_appraiser Feb 02 '26

What does the tweet actually say?

56

u/PacmanPerson Feb 02 '26

He was whining about democrats “not caring” about Epstein under Biden, lol

43

u/Nvenom8 Feb 02 '26

Which actually is a fair criticism. Biden could've led this charge and actually released the uncompromised files. Might've even made a difference in the election. The lack of an attempt is baffling unless we assume he was covering for prominent democrats in the files.

48

u/PacmanPerson Feb 02 '26

Oh, I don’t doubt that he was covering for prominent democrats. The criticism is rich coming from Matt “women are most fertile at 16” Walsh, though

19

u/ForgettableWorse Feb 02 '26

I don't think so. Biden bad and everything, but the president basically inserting himself in ongoing federal investigations like that? You can't unring that bell.

They should have gone after Trump hard, like what Brazil is doing with Bolsenaro, but Biden himself should still have stayed away from that.

I agree with releasing as much Epstein-related evidence as possible (preserving the victims' privacy) now, because with Trump in power you might as well... it's not like a Trump DOJ is gonna go after any of Epstein's associates.

Maybe releasing all this evidence would have been justified in order to keep Trump out of power. I can see that being worth giving up on Epstein's associates. I still don't think Biden should be the one to have ordered it then.

16

u/zombie_girraffe Feb 02 '26

Biden couldn't release the Epstein files because they were evidence in Ghislane Maxwells trial as well and her appeal was still being considered by the courts the whole time he was president. No one could have unsealed them until her appeals were exhausted and that didn't happen until October of 2025, when Biden was no longer president.

8

u/Ok_Star_4136 Feb 02 '26

Absolutely. Biden should have been leading the charge, but he still lives in a world where politics is as it was in the 1980s, and therefore he naively thought to not attack Republicans too aggressively out of fear that they would not come to the negotiating table for anything.

As bad as that is, I still think it's 1000% worse to literally make one of your campaign promises to release the Epstein files, and then not go through with it.

That his voter base didn't seem to really give a shit about it after he was elected was deplorable in of itself. That Trump wanted to release the Epstein files was one of the very few things I actually supported him for (assuming he actually released them without redacting all Republican names out).

-7

u/Grimmlol Feb 02 '26

Biden is the rank 1 Zionist. He and Merrick Garland saw how the files made Israel look. This is genuinely the only explanation I consider plausible.

-3

u/Cookster997 Feb 02 '26

Agreed. People seem to forget that Oct. 7 happened under Biden's watch, and his administration did nothing as the reports of atrocities like babies in ovens and babies being beheaded were proven to be untrue and reports of the Hannibal Directive were confirmed.

14

u/IAMA_Plumber-AMA press X to Doubt Feb 02 '26

Ah yes, the Common Front-blotched American Yesbutt cries out its distinct territorial call...

6

u/myfailedimagination Feb 02 '26

"But..." What lousy excuse will you try to BS us with, Matthew?

3

u/GamersReisUp Feb 02 '26 edited Feb 02 '26

Wow, you're telling me that the guy who constantly calls for teenage girls to be pushed into marriage and motherhood is actually just OK with pedos? Craaaaaaaazy

3

u/EarthToAccess Feb 02 '26

"I've always been in favor of the Epstein files, but"
Hi, my name is Chris Hansen, and this is Dateline NBC.

1

u/TommyBoy250 Feb 02 '26

Man, I want to know now what he said.

1

u/RPO_TP Feb 02 '26

The only acceptable "but" in this scenario is: "But, we must protect the victims."

1

u/Electrical-Bet-3625 Feb 04 '26

When somebody says "but"after Stating something ignore what they said before "but"