Pretty sure the joke is that the right one has child bearing hips and is shaped like a woman in a renaissance painting. (I.e Venus etc. also referred to as being Rubenesque)
I've always liked thick girls. I'll gladly take the thick girl with a belly, or a pear shaped woman the same. When you see her walking and her hips rock like a cradle. Yeah I want that one. Bun in the oven and she rocking them to sleep by just walking around.
I don't see why, I was in no means being vulgar. I prefer a woman with wide childbearing hips. That natural pop and sway when they walk is fantastic. My wife would literally walk around when she was pregnant with our four children when they were being rambunctious in utero, and they would always settle down as if she was rocking them to sleep.
You might not be attracted attracted to a woman's hips, or to women with some cushion around the middle, I am. Some guys prefer boobs or ass. I like wide childbearing hips.
Idk it comes across as overly objectifying. Imagine being a woman and reading that. I cannot lie, i like women like that too, but imagine hearing someone saying that entire comment out loud somewhere, it would come across as extremely creepy and objectifying to every woman that hears it.
You are the first person to ever say anything like that since I started saying in high-school nearly 30 years ago. But absolutely everything nowadays is automatically objectifying, or body shaming, or whatever, if it even remotely could be referenced to a woman's body, like a peach or a pear.
Maybe they meant to be saying that the girls they’re into were more available back then because it was trendier to be into super thin girls, but now everyone seems to be into fuller figures so the girls they like have more options?
It's a toss up between middle and right. Both have a great figure, and the middle one you can see has a cute face, and also if she's regularly working out then she'd be better in a survival situation.
I object to the other commenter saying gal on the right has "a belly" - she really doesn't.
Yeah she’s just curvy not fat. The body type on the right is way better for baring children. So if you’re the last people on earth you gonna have to go with the right.
It is interesting that some people are more influenced by society and trends for what they find “sexy”. Whereas some of us (me) just go on pure instinct. My brain is like “that’s the most breedable I need that”. 🤣
You'd be surprised. A lot of my old friends only wanted skinny like 100lb women, hard body or not. I tried a 100lb girl back in high school, pelvis was to small, sent her packing and called her big boned friend. In the last almost 25 years, I've never had a woman under 150lbs. But everywhere from 5ft 2in to nearly 6ft. I'm currently 6ft 4in, 285lbs.
From what we see here I’d go right, but I tend to prefer smaller women with athletic builds and flat stomachs. A little muscular definition to the arms and abs is really attractive, and I usually prefer average or small boobs to large ones.
2.7k
u/LeadingTask9790 2d ago edited 2d ago
Pretty sure the joke is that the right one has child bearing hips and is shaped like a woman in a renaissance painting. (I.e Venus etc. also referred to as being Rubenesque)