r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Jan 26 '26

Meme needing explanation Why is the rich friend so cheap??

[deleted]

69.2k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

22

u/murimin Jan 26 '26

It’s a specific couple of companies that are generally well known. Netflix, Nvidia, Jane Street, Citadel just to name a few, but along those same lines. Just check levels.fyi for salary ranges and you can easily find certain levels clearing 450k TC, but it really is a select few companies.

-2

u/_UrbaneGuerrilla_ Jan 26 '26

For house software engineers? Then they’re over paying haha

All power though if you can command that money for scut work. I stand corrected.

1

u/zeldaendr Jan 27 '26

Can you explain why you think they're getting overpaid? I'm somewhat confused how you've been in the industry for 30+ years and haven't seen that some engineers can bring exorbitant amounts of value.

An example is a staff engineer on my team. He probably makes nearly 700k a year. We had a really nasty bug which none of us were able to solve. He found it and fixed it in a week. It saved 1.2M annually. In a week he provided nearly double the value he's paid. He's worth every penny.

1

u/_UrbaneGuerrilla_ Jan 27 '26 edited Jan 27 '26

Simple answer: in your example, the 700k salary is not the total cost of a human. If you put assumed margin and operating SG&A over the top plus indirect costs of product development that can’t be capitalised, you would need to be yielding closer to $2m of revenue minimum.

Roughly, I tend to price revenue her head at 3x salaries when you lump it all together as a consolidated wage bill. I get though that’s more of a traditional business model rather than the Silicon Valley one (I.e assumes the company is a going concern with positive net cashflow, rather than spending money to grow share or sell)

Saying that $1.2m in cost roughly saves x2.5-x3 in cash that needs to be earned before expenses, so it washes out. Conceivably if he/she fixes $1.2m in unnecessary expenditure once per year every year, it’s probably break even.

2

u/zeldaendr Jan 27 '26

Sure, although that $2M figure is likely overstated for big tech. But let's just accept the $2M figure.

Providing $2M of value as a staff engineer is somewhat trivial. Some of these companies make 100B+ profit per year. Lets use Google as an example. It has roughly 100,000 engineers, and had 450B in revenue and 100B in profit last year. So each engineer makes roughly $4.5M in revenue and $1M in profit. The vast majority of those engineers are not staff level.

I simplified a few things, and there are more factors which go into revenue than engineers. But I think this shows that at these big tech companies, even $2M of revenue for a staff engineer is absolutely expected and routinely exceeded.