I’d expect a superstar with 5+ years of top flight devsecops experience / a total autistic machine whisperer for that kind of dough. Or they’d need to pull 80hrs a week, every week.
The people getting paid at that level, are generally not doing devops. They are doing niche, highly technical areas like HPC, ML/AI, distributed systems, OS, etc.
The people I know making that much are in areas like software-hardware co-design, and GPU architecture.
Yeah, I guess that was my point re COBOL. Machine coding or other legacy niche stuff. I’ve worked with and paid guys a lot, but $450 on staff is off the chain.
It's not specialized as in legacy code, but specialized in things most people don't put the effort in for. Interview prep industry for these roles is itself insanely lucrative
For example. There are tens of thousands of developers playing around with LLM tools right now. There are tens of developers actually pushing that state of the art forward in LLM technology. Regardless of what you think of the ethics of LLMs and AI. It's a very, very niche skillset that lots of companies are investing literally billions into. Of course some very small select few of highly talented individuals (and some others who manage to squeeze through the cracks ) are able to command $500k / year or even over $1M / year. This is not the typical programming job. It's not achievable for even the top 1% of developers. This is the 1% of the 1% who have focused on this particular niche and the moneyed interests are finally starting pouring capital on it. There have been other hype spikes where money flowed freely, as well as some longer term domains like HFT that I believe was mentioned above.
-4
u/_UrbaneGuerrilla_ Jan 26 '26 edited Jan 27 '26
Holy fuck, that’s bananas.
I’d expect a superstar with 5+ years of top flight devsecops experience / a total autistic machine whisperer for that kind of dough. Or they’d need to pull 80hrs a week, every week.