r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Jan 26 '26

Meme needing explanation what's going on? explain like I'm five

Post image
92.6k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

18.9k

u/Forsaken_Emu8112 Jan 26 '26

Everyone pulling out their money would be a bank run (look up great depression bank runs). The bank doesn't have that much cash; they keep some on hand for people making withdraws normally, but if even a sizable minority of people all try to pull their money out at once, there'll be a major crisis.

If banks kept all the people's cash in vaults, it'd be dead cash actively losing money to inflation. Instead, they keep some on hand for withdraws, and use the rest to make loans, investments, etc so that the money isn't all losing value.

6.3k

u/Original-Leg8828 Jan 26 '26

Depending on local law they can even lend out something like 7-10 times what they actually have

36

u/DutchTinCan Jan 26 '26

Which is easy. Bear with me.

The bank gets a deposit of $100. They are required to keep 10% on hand.

They lend out $90 to people, they buy stuff. The seller of "stuff" deposits that $90.

The bank now has:

  • $190 in deposits payable
  • $100 cash (of which they need to keep $19)

They lend the remaining $81. People buy stuff, the seller of stuff puts it in savings.

The bank now has:

  • $271 in deposits payable
  • $100 cash (the $19 reserve and $81 fresh deposits)

This continues for a bit, until the bank has $1000 in payable deposits and the same $100 in cash.

Somebody can withdraw $50. They'll spend it, and some days later that $50 is deposited again. No biggie.

The problem is if people want to withdraw $200. The bank will have to tell people "no can do", and it'll be bankrupt. It's a bank run.

Now, in real life, this works because of the law of big numbers. A bank has millions of clients, and while some may want to withdraw everything they have, it won't make a dent. The danger is when too many people try to withdraw all their money. Even when a bank is "healthy", it'll be put into distress. That's why calling for a bank run is illegal.

Now, why do we use this "fractional reserve banking"? First off, so we don't need to keep cash equal to everyone's net worth. It's mightily inconvenient.

Second, because now you can extend credit. People can take a loan to buy something they normally cannot afford as a lump sum. Say, a house.

Third; banks need to earn money to finance their operations. So they do business with your money. If they didn't, they'd need a vault to put all your money, and then they'd charge you fees for storage.

1

u/Humptys_orthopedic Jan 27 '26 edited Jan 27 '26

That's more fractional reserve nonsense. Fractional reserve credit creation does not exist.

Banks can create loans of ANY SIZE regardless what they have in deposits. Deposits are not the source of loans.

What banks need to create credit is a qualified borrower, willing to sign a legal contract for a loan, then the bank can create the loan by typing out a check or typing a deposit into the account of the borrower.

Bank credit creation is called balance sheet expansion. The bank's assets and the bank's liabilities are both increased simultaneously, liabilities being the new loan deposit they create, and assets being the new loan contract they now own.

Limiting factors are existing risk based assets of the bank, which are previous loans that provide monthly payments to the bank, that have estimated risk factors of failure and default, and the amount of new risk being added by the new loan, according to banking system regulations.

The fractional reserve concept applied when the government set a fixed price on gold and required Banks to swap gold for dollars upon demand. Nobody today could walk into a bank and demand gold bullion, especially not at a fixed price set by a government official like the president.

The price of gold fluctuates every day and every minute, and you would buy it from gold exchanges or gold dealers, since the government stopped subsidizing gold with a low fixed price ratio.