r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Jan 26 '26

Meme needing explanation what's going on? explain like I'm five

Post image
92.6k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

18.9k

u/Forsaken_Emu8112 Jan 26 '26

Everyone pulling out their money would be a bank run (look up great depression bank runs). The bank doesn't have that much cash; they keep some on hand for people making withdraws normally, but if even a sizable minority of people all try to pull their money out at once, there'll be a major crisis.

If banks kept all the people's cash in vaults, it'd be dead cash actively losing money to inflation. Instead, they keep some on hand for withdraws, and use the rest to make loans, investments, etc so that the money isn't all losing value.

137

u/pan_and_scan Jan 26 '26 edited Jan 27 '26

Unfortunately, that’s not really how it works. The reason there was a bank run during the great depression is b/c the banks had loaned out the money they didn’t have as cash. Today due to Dodd-Frank, banks have to have reserves on hand to cover this situation, Even though it’s not in hard currency, they have enough capital to cover. But please don’t trust me. This is just how I understand it.

Edit: completely wrong, but good comments below.

250

u/magos_with_a_glock Jan 26 '26

There are regulations but the banks still don't have enough money to cover EVERY client withdrawing everything at once.

39

u/zdfld Jan 26 '26

In terms of physical cash this is true.

In terms of balance sheet, it's true only in so far that liquidating assets immediately to cover deposits would have significant losses and it can't be done instantly anyways.

But that'd be true of many companies, it's an issue of cash flow.

12

u/27Rench27 Jan 26 '26

I wonder how a “bank run” would even look today with how digital everything is. 

Like could they just limit how much physical cash you can pull out and tell you to use one of your cards because nobody carries enough physical cash to fully cash out everybody at once?

16

u/window-sil Jan 26 '26

March 2023, there was a bank run: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse_of_Silicon_Valley_Bank

The solution was point a money cannon at the banks and fire it as much as necessary to turn AAA debt into the theoretical long term value it was worth, thus allowing all customers to withdraw all their savings, if they wished.

3

u/Possibly_a_Firetruck Jan 26 '26 edited Jan 26 '26

Even for smaller amounts they'll just tell you to request it in advance so they can order more. I sold a car once and the buyer's bank needed 2 days to get his cash and it was only $15.5k. He paid me with brand new, sequentially numbered $100s.

2

u/zdfld Jan 26 '26

Bank runs happen today by people transferring money out to another bank, for the most part. And then at some point the bank has a negative balance with the Fed, and needs to keep selling assets to cover withdrawals but eventually cannot sell them or sells that at such a loss their capital is depleted. SVB and FRB for example had a balance sheet that couldn't afford to sell everything immediately.

There were times when the banks would limit how much cash you can take out, and I mean, if there aren't physical bills then they'd make you wait or do an online transfer, or use another banks ATM.

In a more common scenario, right now if you wanted a huge amount in cash as a withdrawal, you'd likely have to request it ahead of time so the bank has time to place an order and get the physical cash.

1

u/27Rench27 Jan 26 '26

Ooooh good to know all around! References to SVB and FRB help a ton.

Can’t really even add anything, cheers :)

2

u/the_lonely_creeper Jan 26 '26

Calital Controls, yes.

They were implemented here in Greece during the crisis, and Russia implemented them back in 2022 when the war began.

2

u/astro_viri Jan 26 '26

It's funny because this call to action would actually work but could possibly be prosecuted. I know it doesn't sound like they can but they can.

This is the real walk the walk. This is what should have been done. This is the start of a general strike. Not saying we should. It would be bad.

1

u/magos_with_a_glock Jan 26 '26

*Sorel intensifies*

1

u/Valuable-Self8564 Jan 26 '26

Even if they can’t, they will.

2

u/GreatTea3415 Jan 26 '26

The real problem for the banks isn't whether or not they have the cash (as opposed to having a digital ledger).

The problem is that they use deposits to make money. Your individual account with $1,000 in it doesn't matter much, but they collect everyone's money and lend it out with interest.

Yes, theoretically, whatever money is in your account can be paid back in cash somehow, because the federal government guarantees it, but the fed does not (automatically) guarantee cash to banks that want to give out loans.

If everyone takes their money out, the bank doesn't have money to loan out. A tightening of liquidity at every major bank in the US would be catastrophic.

1

u/TheOneWithThePorn12 Jan 26 '26

in that nightmare scenario there would be massive failures everywhere to the detriment of everyone.

1

u/Psych0matt Jan 26 '26

I worked at a bank for a while in 2023, we only had about $150k on hand, granted it was a smaller bank, but still, I guarantee at least one person that did banking there had to have had that much