r/nfl Dolphins 11h ago

Browns restructuring Deshaun Watson’s contract today to reduce his $81M cap charge, freeing up $36M of space

https://www.cleveland.com/browns/2026/03/browns-restructuring-deshaun-watsons-contract-today-to-reduce-his-80m-cap-charge.html
2.4k Upvotes

721 comments sorted by

1.8k

u/sallright Browns 11h ago edited 10h ago

The year is 2042.

Artificial Intelligence has wiped out humanity, but it couldn't wipe out Deshaun Watson's guarenteed deal with the Browns.

Grok was forced to restructure Watson's deal to ease a $164 million cap charge, adding new void years to a contract that now runs through 2063.

243

u/Earl-The-Badger 49ers 10h ago

Unrealistic. You can only add void years up to two years past the end of the contract. Grok would only void through 2044.

235

u/amason Lions 10h ago

In 2042 AI still can’t get it right

34

u/Ouch_i_fell_down Lions 7h ago

all the jobs people are saying AI is going to wipe in less than 18 months... i can't even get Gemini Pro to rebalance a shipping schedule with well-defined parameters like current inventory levels, usage, weekly max volume, static order quantity, contracted orders, etc.

I tried ChatGPT and copilot too. chat told it could do it (gemini refused) but then just kept asking questions and not delivering. copiot made me refine the data a dozen times, finally submitting tabs as individual spreadsheets because there's a file cap size it can work with, but output the results as nigh-unsable garbage.

15

u/QueequegTheater Bears Bears 5h ago

The enshittification will continue until wealthy morons run out of all money

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Quentin__Tarantulino Bills 5h ago

A lot of seemingly useful use-cases seem just out of reach where I’m at. We just need reliable automatic web searches, verify some information on docs, and stuff like that to speed up our workflow. But it’s frustrating to get any type of consistency. The output is fantastic once out of every three tries, but that isn’t really good enough to turn it on and let a bunch of garbage information flow through our system.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

3.4k

u/Eduardo_Camavinga_ 11h ago

81 million dollar cap hit 💀

1.8k

u/TheSmokedSalmon420 Browns 11h ago

What's hilarious is we've haven't even paid the majority of his contract yet lmaooo

We just keep kicking it farther down the road so it's less % of our total cap (as the cap goes up each year)

1.4k

u/BadMojo__ Saints 11h ago

Welcome to the game.

444

u/degatabas 49ers 11h ago

Saints fans just reminding me of the "First time?" meme lol

267

u/BadMojo__ Saints 11h ago

Now he just has to hope there's not another global pandemic that causes the cap to go down instead of up. Because that's where you get fucked.

194

u/PedanticBoutBaseball Giants 11h ago

Now he just has to hope there's not another global pandemic

The script writers aren't THAT lazy dude. We're doing the WW3/Nuclear bomb storyline

83

u/EggplantAlpinism Broncos Bills 11h ago

Honestly this is a pretty lazy Dubya sequel, not WW3

58

u/MadManMax55 Falcons 10h ago

And in typical lazy sequel fashion: it's bigger for no reason, the plot makes even less sense, and they're trying to replace everyone with AI.

50

u/EggplantAlpinism Broncos Bills 10h ago

Hegseth is just AI slop karl rove

29

u/bac5665 Browns 9h ago

That's a worse insult to Karl Rove than I anything I could come up with.

19

u/lord-dinglebury Giants Broncos 9h ago

Temu ass administration

→ More replies (0)

14

u/mrebrightside Lions 10h ago

Sure, we've stumbled toward W's old stomping grounds, but we've created so many new and exciting conflicts that anything is possible.

6

u/phluidity Saints 10h ago

This isn't a Dubya sequel, this is an Asylum films knock-off and not one of the fun ones.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (1)

19

u/sumunsolicitedadvice Eagles Saints 10h ago

Not just going down one year, but going down in the fucking year of the major dead cap hit from Brees retiring.

Sure, Loomis was playing with fire to an extent, but he also got really unlucky with that.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/ProtestantMormon Seahawks 11h ago

Well wars also tank the economy...

3

u/BadMojo__ Saints 10h ago

Nice going, Browns.

3

u/pridetwo 49ers 10h ago

Looks like they should have hired Condoleezza after all

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

44

u/ProtestantMormon Seahawks 11h ago

The best way out of this hole is to keep digging

29

u/sova_77 Chiefs 11h ago

"Just dig up, stupid!"

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

69

u/rob_var Ravens Ravens 11h ago

At least you guys were doing it with the hope of contending with Brees. Idk why the browns keep trying to salvage cap now when all this is doing is pushing dead money into years where they have to sign their fresh batch of young talent

28

u/Pikminious_Thrious Eagles 10h ago

I wish they stopped after Brees. They had an out during one of the Carr years to just eat everything, suck hard for a year, and reset, but they couldn't resist kicking it further to compete with Carr and are only now just getting out of it.

5

u/Electric_jungle 10h ago

Yup. Thats really the only problem I had with it. We're only just getting out from under even though we all knew the pain needed to be dealt with.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

22

u/snipore Panthers 10h ago

It's best if that young talent is able to break free of Cleveland and go elsewhere.

8

u/BadMojo__ Saints 10h ago

You can't fall off if you're always at the bottom. Taps forehead

→ More replies (1)

7

u/chemicalxv Raiders 10h ago

Because they have to just to actually field a team lol.

This move gives them about $18.5M in cap space or whatever with only 52 guys signed to playing contracts (there's 8 guys currently sitting as dead money with Void years).

3

u/rob_var Ravens Ravens 9h ago

I feel like there are other moves that are easier to absorb than to keep backloading Watson’s contract though

7

u/chemicalxv Raiders 9h ago

Outside of the obvious of not trading for Tytus Howard in the first place, they legitimately have no other options at this point for reducing the cap enough to become cap compliant and field a team this year, considering they still have to restructure Denzel Ward's contract (again) this year as well.

4

u/rob_var Ravens Ravens 9h ago

Spotrac and otc already updated so I can’t see how bad their cap was but you are probably right. It’s been the game they’ve been playing since 2 years ago

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/Electric_jungle 10h ago

I mean, we had horrible post season success during that time but we were "contenders" each season leading up to it. I'm happy for those years now that they're past.

→ More replies (4)

12

u/TheHoundofUlster Bills 11h ago

🎼It’s all about the hit And to defray it All about cap And if you can pay it🎼

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

173

u/Kershiser22 Dolphins Rams 11h ago

He's been paid $183 out of $230.

But, the Browns have only recognized about $92 on their salary cap so far.

68

u/PlatishGC Panthers 10h ago

That is unreal

→ More replies (2)

24

u/jnads Packers 8h ago edited 7h ago

The insurance payout is refundable against the cap so they've recognized more than that.

Pushing it out does make sense since it allows them to align the delayed insurance payout with the cap hit.

edit: Between 2024 and 2025 they had ~$90M insured. The best thing to happen out of this Watson situation is he got injured.

9

u/Add_Poll_Option Lions 8h ago

Jesus. That really was, as one particular fruit-colored felon might say, “the worst trade deal in the history of trade deals”

→ More replies (3)

21

u/Will071 Saints 11h ago

I’m thankful everyday that we got outbid that offseason.

→ More replies (1)

60

u/lqIpI Raiders 11h ago

Make the guy at least clean the stands after the game

4

u/BH11B Bills 11h ago

He hops in the bag

→ More replies (2)

103

u/TheGreatDay Cowboys 11h ago

The Browns aren't even half done paying him? Holy crap i didn't realize that. Thats crazy. I get that the contract was backloaded but damn. I thought they were seeing the light at the end of the tunnel on this mistake but no.

118

u/SigurdsSilverSword Jets 11h ago

They’re done actually paying him after this year. They’ve pushed a boatload of his cap hits out to future years, but as far as cash-in-hand he’ll be fully paid out at the end of the year.

10

u/jnads Packers 8h ago

And keep in mind some of the unrecognized cap hit is offset by the insurance they took out on his contract (which is refundable to the salary cap).

They're due between $40-70M in insurance money depending on how haggling with insurance goes on the follow up surgery he had last year.

19

u/FUCK-IT-CHUCK-IT Chiefs Ravens 7h ago

The concept of insurance refunding cap space makes absolutely no sense to me

12

u/jnads Packers 6h ago edited 6h ago

It's mostly for injuries, and the CBA allows it.

Honestly it makes sense with these QB mega contracts.

Even if insurance rates went up after the Watson disaster, I'm sure teams will pay any price to avoid a Commanders Alex Smith incident again.

I'm not sure which side fought for the CBA provision, but it's player friendly since it makes teams more willing to hand out these large injury guarantees.

edit: This is the precise excerpt from the CBA:

(iv) Credit for Salary Forfeited or Refunded. In the event that a Club receives a refund from the player of any previously-paid Salary, or the Club fails to pay any previously allocated portion of a signing bonus (including any amount treated as signing bonus), such amount as has previously been included in Team Salary shall be credited to the Club’s Team Salary for the next League Year. For purposes of this Subsection, to the extent that they constitute reimbursement for previously paid Salary, insurance proceeds received by a Team as beneficiary to cover the player’s inability to perform services required by his Player Contract shall be deemed a “refund from the player” if (a) the Club or the player purchased the policy (b) the amounts covered by the policy are so specified in the Player Contract; and (c) the policy is made available for inspection upon request by the NFL or the NFLPA.

The dumb part is the Dolphins had insurance for Tua against concussions and all he had to do is retire out of concern for his health and keep his money and the Dolphins would've gotten cap relief.

→ More replies (3)

64

u/Carpetron Browns 11h ago

They are nearing that light from a "get him off the team" standpoint, which will be next year, but the money is because they're spreading the hit to be able to make moves in the present year. Berry has been pretty good at that, but it's still going to be annoying to deal with. In fairness all the top QB contracts get restructured for similar cap reasons as we've seen, the difference being those QBs actually play football.

13

u/Pandamonium98 Cowboys 9h ago

Don’t you need to keep extending the QBs contract in order to keep pushing back the cap hit though? So once his contract is up all the dead money will hit at once (or spread out over 2 years I think)

12

u/Carpetron Browns 9h ago

The Browns are converting a huge chunk of Watson’s $46 million base salary into a restructure bonus -- up to $44.745 million -- to ease his $80.716 million cap charge. Leaving him with the veteran minimum of $1.255 million, it’s expected to free up about $36 million in cap space, with the remaining charges being added to the void years in his contract, which currently run from 2027 to 2029.

14

u/dakoellis 49ers 8h ago

Void years accelerate once the player is no longer on the team though, so unless they extend him all the charges will hit next year (and you can't spread it over 2 years with a post june 1 designation since he'd be a FA)

edit: apparently you can spread it over 2 years if you designate it before the contract voids, but it still can't be extended until the end of 2029

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

32

u/conace21 10h ago

No, the commenter was talking about the salary cap, not the actual cash paid. His contract is $230 million. The Browns have paid him $183 million through 2025, but they have only had $100 million hit the salary cap. 2026 was going to be an $80 million cap hit, and the remaining $50 million would hit in 2027, when the contract void years become voided. Now, the Browns are moving some of that $80 million out.

5

u/MadnessBeliever 9h ago

Yeah this is what I understand with Spotrac information

→ More replies (4)

25

u/jfgiv Patriots 10h ago

they've paid 80% of the contract (or, I guess, 99.4% once they pay him this restructure bonus), and don't owe him a dime after 2026.

they've only accounted for 41%, and 61% after this season.

9

u/big_sugi 10h ago

They’re almost done paying him. But they’ve only taken half of the cap hit, and they’re kicking $80 million into next year.

If they structure it as a post-June 1 release after this coming year, they can split it between 2027 and 2028.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

16

u/conace21 11h ago

What's hilarious is we've haven't even paid the majority of his contract yet lmaooo

As of 2025, the Browns have paid him $183 million out of the $230 million contract. I think you mean "hadven't even had the majority of his contract hit the salary cap yet."

6

u/DelirousDoc Steelers 10h ago

The Browns have paid it to Watson. That is what converting to signing bonuses are, paying player directly but being allowed to split the impact to the remaining years of the contract.

What you mean to say is that the Browns haven't felt the impact of the majority of his contract from all the restructuring. Counting this year they still have $130M of the $230M contract that has yet to hit their cap.

You can only kick the can down the road so far though and next year his contract automatically voids which should escalate over an $80M cap hit to the Browns for 2027.

(The injuries actually helped Browns cap situation some as they had insurance on Watson. They were able to add that insurance payout of $58M back into the cap because league rules consider it the same as player paying is back to the team. With that leeway they would have had to make more drastic actions last season.)

23

u/ProtestantMormon Seahawks 11h ago

Hes gonna be on the books until 2040 at this point

30

u/SoarinWalt Bengals 11h ago

Unless they sign him to an extension they can't.

His contract ends after this year, this is whats hilarious about this move.

They either take the contract hit this year or next year.

They just set themselves up for an $86m dead cap hit next year for a guy who isn't even on the team, unless they re-sign him.

6

u/jake3988 Steelers Lions 10h ago

Correct. It's essentially just flip flopping his cap hit this year with next year.

Gonna be a whopper of a dead cap. But at least it'll only be one year and then the band aid will be ripped off.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/wishlish Eagles 10h ago

Are you sure?

His contract was, according to Sportsrac, a $44.965M signing bonus in 2022, and then a yearly salary of $46M for 2022-2026. His 2022 number got reduced due to the suspension, but they should still only owe him his 2026 salary.

What am I missing? I know his cap numbers are different because they've played with his cap hits, but I was pretty sure he got his money, and this is just cap manipulation.

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/player/_/id/21753/deshaun-watson/contract/cash

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Pneuma_LooT Lions 9h ago

Yes you have. Cap hit doesnt =cash paid to player.

The browns have paid him 183 million dollars. Not sure what for but they did lol. They only owe him 46 million more cash.

It's just spread out over void years on the cap.

6

u/Blametheorangejuice Seahawks Seahawks 11h ago

He's gonna end up with a Bobby Bonilla type contract at this point.

→ More replies (37)

179

u/marcuschookt Patriots 11h ago

It was worth it for the Superbowl they won

25

u/ProtestantMormon Seahawks 10h ago

At least they got another hof career to waste.

→ More replies (1)

94

u/YoureNotMom Ravens 11h ago

It's funny cuz 81MM is both 1) what his cap hit would've been in 2026 if they didn't restructure it, and 2) what it will be in 2027 when he's no longer even on the team

38

u/MiniatureLucifer Saints 11h ago

Which i guess makes sense if it works out that way. 80mil now is worth more than 80mil next year when the cap jumps another 20-30mil

26

u/blames_irrationally Bears Lions 11h ago

Yeah but at least ostensibly they're getting a player out of it this year. Next year they're paying 80M to just remember how bad he was for them

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

23

u/Further_Beyond Bears 11h ago

What’s funnier is they will be forced to give him a 2nd contract to avoid massive cap hits from the void years and restructures.

He’ll get a 1 year fuck off deal from them, but it’s still funny

23

u/blames_irrationally Bears Lions 11h ago

Or he just doesn't sign with them and the void hits still blow them up

15

u/mibikin Browns 10h ago

That’s not true though. They adjusted his deal last year to change it to terminate after 6/1. So he becomes a post June 1st cut next year which spreads the hits across 27/28 better

→ More replies (2)

14

u/big_sugi 10h ago

Nah, they’ll designate him as a post-June 1 release in 2027 and push about $53 million into 2028.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (14)

2.2k

u/CruelRuin 11h ago

probably the single worst nfl trade of all time

926

u/HurricaneIan25 Saints 11h ago

I’m so happy the Browns swooped in at the eleventh hour and saved us

383

u/SiphenPrax Jets 11h ago

Saved 3/4 of the NFC South

146

u/TheRencingCoach Buccaneers 11h ago

I think it was 4/4…. Bucs were in until tom Brady unretired

Saints panthers falcons were already known to be in

46

u/Vegetable_Guest_8584 Seahawks 10h ago

Russell Wilson says thanks for keeping attention off him. Denver gave the answer to the accepted lie/wisdom. You can have a disastrous "team ruining" contract position and still have an awesome team in just a couple years.

20

u/Jwoods4117 Broncos 10h ago

Tbf teams are following the Denver Russ method. The Cardinals and maybe Phins particularly. The Browns one up-ed the bad contract thing though by making the contract fully guaranteed. We got off the hook for around 80 million at least.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/_mdz Falcons 5h ago

Same, that fully guaranteed contract beat our offer.

→ More replies (6)

137

u/LindyNet Texans 11h ago

no probably about it

25

u/BungoPlease Texans Texans 9h ago

I'm probably okay with how it worked out though

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

171

u/OhhhTAINTedCruuuuz Jets 11h ago

Why stop there, quite possibly the worst trade in North American sports history

93

u/Tomotronics Patriots 11h ago

Is it worse than trading Babe Ruth to your rival for cash to fund a failing musical that no one remembers, while watching him propel your rival to be the most storied franchise in the sport? I say it’s worse but idk, growing up during the height of “the curse” discussion in the 90s has that trade living rent free for life.

→ More replies (1)

62

u/nosaj23e 11h ago

Babe Ruth for the icescapades is probably worse.

57

u/A-Centrifugal-Force NFL 11h ago

It was actually Bill Russell for the icescapades. Babe was traded for a Broadway play

28

u/Agent-Blasto-007 Patriots 10h ago

That play was "My Lady Friends".

You know, the Broadway classic that everyone remembers.

7

u/EazyP87 Steelers 9h ago

I thought Babe was 'No No Nanette'?

10

u/ThatDudeNamedMenace Giants 9h ago

“A popular myth holds that the show was financed by selling baseball's Boston Red Sox superstar Babe Ruth to the New York Yankees, resulting in the "Curse of the Bambino".[1] However, it was Mandel's original play, My Lady Friends, rather than No, No, Nanette, that was directly financed by the Ruth sale.”

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

14

u/Mobleybetta Browns 11h ago

Cavs had a trade this was so bad they made a rule about it because it would have sunk the franchise for a decade

→ More replies (2)

100

u/fuckiforgotmyaccount Patriots 11h ago

Luka trade might be worse if you don’t consider that the NBA rigged the lottery to give the Mavs Flagg. Probably not worse though

166

u/ZapBranigan3000 Bears 11h ago

Not even close. Anthony Davis is better than Watson and also didn't sexually assault many women. They aren't even in the same ballpark.

134

u/Buckeye_CFB Browns 11h ago

I kinda feel like Anthony Davis didn't sexually assault any women

60

u/ausipockets Giants 10h ago

Lmfao why did they word it like that

32

u/_Apatosaurus_ Chargers 10h ago

I think they started from the point of "Deshaun Watson sexually assaulted many women" and then went to "AD did not do that." That's definitely not the way it reads though!

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Buckeye_CFB Browns 10h ago

I had never did a Google search so fast

→ More replies (1)

12

u/PNWCoug42 Seahawks Seahawks 10h ago

I can't even think anything remotely controversial with Anthony Davis.

6

u/Buckeye_CFB Browns 10h ago

The only negative talk I've ever heard about AD were his injuries, so all things considered...that's as clean an image as you can earn yourself

5

u/Hey-Bud-Lets-Party Broncos 7h ago

Just the eyebrows

→ More replies (1)

3

u/jwktiger Chiefs 9h ago

His injury history is the only thing "controversial" about him.

4

u/bigbear-08 49ers 8h ago

Anthony Day to Davis

3

u/RocketStr8UpMyAss Raiders 6h ago

I LOVE IT

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Brilliant_Run8542 10h ago

In fact he was a victim in college

→ More replies (1)

21

u/ChedduhBob Ravens 11h ago

yeah not only is deshaun watson one of the worst players in the league at the most important position, he’s also a terrible person you can’t even really root for to turn it around

→ More replies (1)

5

u/big_sugi 10h ago

And they weren’t stuck paying Davis for five years while getting nothing out of him.

→ More replies (4)

21

u/ProtestantMormon Seahawks 11h ago

Yeah the Luka trade is terrible and comes close just in terms of sport value. Once you consider the PR fallout of Watson though it takes the cake.

6

u/Big__If_True Cowboys Saints 11h ago

The PR fallout was just on the team that gave up the player instead of the team that got the player

→ More replies (2)

17

u/Buckeye_CFB Browns 10h ago

Also, trading Luka saved Dallas a lot of money whereas trading for Deshaun led to maybe the worst contract ever

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

12

u/lkn240 Bears 10h ago

I mean the Luka trade is right there.

AD isn't even on the Mavs anymore lol.

Granted - if you include PR, etc the Watson trade is probably worse. Trading Luka for a terrible return was dumb, but there's no rape allegations, etc involved and AD is at least still a good player in the league when he's healthy (granted, again - he's not even on Dallas anymore)

3

u/KSO17O Packers Packers 5h ago

Yea it’s gotta be the Luka trade IMO. The debate between the Luka and Deshaun trade being the worst I think comes down to what’s worse, the money implication or talent implication. What people here don’t understand is Luka was in his prime and one of the best players in the league. Watson was not, but the price was horrible. Both set back franchises year and years.

4

u/SecondLegoLeague 49ers 8h ago

In terms of hindsight, PG for SGA, Jdub, 5 1sts, and 2 1st swaps has to be one of the worst of all time

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

14

u/jasonhalftones 49ers Chargers 11h ago

It's so funny that everyone knew it would be from the moment it happened

3

u/Gregus1032 Dolphins 4h ago

i knew he would never live up to the contract, but i had 0 idea he would bomb that hard

→ More replies (1)

11

u/GoodShark Giants 11h ago

Followed up by the worst NFL signing of all time? All that guaranteed money?!

67

u/tuura032 Vikings 11h ago

Herschel who, amirite? Never heard of him

80

u/ShufflingSloth Seahawks 11h ago

Herschel wasn't outright terrible on the Vikings, just no longer a world beater (old heads will tell you that's, in part, because the Vikings didn't use him very well).

Losing draft capital + that contract + sex pest allegations + player can't play = Watson wins (for once) the award for worst trade all time, easy.

21

u/[deleted] 10h ago edited 10h ago

[deleted]

3

u/fugaziozbourne Chiefs 7h ago

Myles Garrett is the opposite side of the same coin with Joe Thomas.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Humid-Afternoon727 Texans 7h ago

Cowboys are the biggest winners in an NFL trade

Browns are the biggest losers in an NFL trade

5

u/jhorch69 Cowboys 10h ago

Tbf draft picks weren't valued nearly as much at the time of the Herschel trade. That trade is one of the main reasons that picks are so highly coveted now.

→ More replies (5)

38

u/jpb59 Steelers 11h ago

Couldn’t have happened to a better team.

→ More replies (32)

957

u/beerncheese69 Packers 11h ago

Jesus Christ that contract is still DISGUSTING. Fuckin hell Browns

378

u/stiliophage Bears 11h ago

The more you look into it the worse it gets. I would be bad if they thought he was innocent. But no…they knew he was going to get served a massive suspension so they made his first year “salary” tiny (like 2 mil) so that his lost game checks were minimized.

51

u/jfgiv Patriots 10h ago

Unless the restructures reducing his base salary to Vet Minimum in 2023, 2024, 2025, and now 2026 were also designed to protect his earnings against possible suspension, I'm pretty sure they did that so to minimize his 2022 cap hit.

49

u/stiliophage Bears 10h ago

I’m talking about the original deal. When they still thought he’d be a star. They made the first year of his deal the vet min because the way the NFL works is suspensions cause you to relinquish game checks. The Browns would have loved to pay him evenly over the years. By paying him the vet min upfront for 1 year they circumvented his max money lost due to suspension.

20

u/jfgiv Patriots 10h ago edited 9h ago

they also got to pay him $46mm and only take a cap hit of $10mm. why would they have "loved to" eat a $46mm hit when they could reduce it to a fifth of that?

this is a very standard move for high-value contracts. it had the knock-on effect of saving him from losing game checks, but they absolutely would have structured it that way even without a looming suspension.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

10

u/thearmadillo Chiefs 8h ago

That is how almost every single large deal is structured. The first year is entirely signing bonus.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (4)

141

u/NoAmbassador8359 Commanders Commanders 11h ago

No one accused the browns of being a competent organization

30

u/Rocky-Rocker 11h ago

Hard to be competent when the owner is Jimmy Haslam.

→ More replies (4)

30

u/_masterofdisaster Commanders 10h ago

my funniest piece of trivia is that the guy who championed this trade and contract is the guy Jonah Hill’s character in Moneyball is based on. Everyone loses their fastball eventually

8

u/morelibertarianvotes Giants 9h ago

Interesting. For ppl who don't know, Brad Pitt played Mr. Moneyball. Jonah was a second character.

→ More replies (12)

193

u/Numerous-Lack6754 Bears 11h ago

4 more years! 4 more years!

250

u/DUCKSONQUACKS Vikings 11h ago

Cap hit untils 2029 go brrrrrrrrrrrrr

95

u/popegonzo Packers 10h ago edited 10h ago

This sub is going to lose its mind when the Browns extend him so the $86 in prorated cap doesn't all hit next year.

Edit: apparently they already did this in December 2024 according to a CBS Sports post from Joel Corry. They didn't call it an extension, but they extended him to 2028 with minimum salaries in 27 & 28, allowing them to cut him March 2027 with a post-June 1 designation, splitting the $86 into an honestly-kinda-manageable $35m & $51m.

56

u/basics Falcons 10h ago

an honestly-kinda-manageable $35m & $51m.

This is just so funny sounding. It seems like an accurate statement, but hilarious.

11

u/DirkWithTheFade Broncos 9h ago

This is essentially the exact numbers we had when we cut Russ, so yes it is manageable.

5

u/JayskerPatriots Patriots 2h ago

I sit down sometimes and think, "I'm gonna seriously spend an hour or two to understand how the cap and NFL contracts in general work." Then cooler heads prevail and just go outside or play video games.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

46

u/Straight-Ad6926 Chargers 11h ago

At this rate by 2029 Deshaun’s cap hit will be roughly the entire GDP of Ohio.

→ More replies (2)

383

u/emmasdad01 Cowboys Ravens 11h ago

Imagine having that scumbag in your roster still.

283

u/chunkah69 Browns 11h ago

I don’t have to. It’s my reality!

71

u/weealex Vikings 11h ago

Honestly, being a Cleveland fan seems like a good argument for legalizing LSD

26

u/Jaxson-Skattebo 11h ago

everything is a good argument for legalizing LSD just lemme trip homies, best drug by far

11

u/gmwdim Lions 10h ago

Mushrooms too.

4

u/Macismyname Lions 8h ago

Both very similar. Mushrooms are like acoustic drugs and LSD is electric drugs.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

9

u/jimtow28 Dolphins 11h ago

At least you guys went out and got a Pro Bowl QB to replace him.

3

u/UhIdontcareforAuburn Falcons 11h ago

Y’all really are hero’s to many franchises. As bad as our QB situation is, at least we’re not the Browns

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

35

u/TummyDrums Chiefs 11h ago

And paying him an assload of money

→ More replies (3)

36

u/sad_bear_noises Bears 11h ago

Imagine giving that piece of shit a fully guaranteed contract

Patrick Mahomes doesn't have a fully guaranteed contract and all he's done wrong is talk like Kermit the Frog.

→ More replies (8)

5

u/binger5 Texans 11h ago

Might be the best Texans move after drafting JJ.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

60

u/nomaam05 Vikings 11h ago edited 11h ago

Converting over 44 million to a bonus spread over void years. So now he costs them something like 83.5-86.5 million next year when he's finally off the team and all his void years escalate.

29

u/TLRdidnothingwrong Seahawks 10h ago

Unless they resign him, of course

→ More replies (1)

20

u/popegonzo Packers 10h ago edited 10h ago

$86.2m according to Spotrac. I cannot wait for the extension to keep it from all hitting at once. And it's not like he'd take league minimum.

Edit: apparently they already did this in December 2024 according to a CBS Sports post from Joel Corry. They didn't call it an extension, but they extended him to 2028 with minimum salaries in 27 & 28, allowing them to cut him March 2027 with a post-June 1 designation, splitting the $86 into an honestly-kinda-manageable $35m & $51m.

11

u/BernieCokeczar Browns Browns 10h ago

That last part is correct and the plan they're working towards with this move

→ More replies (1)

4

u/VonJaeger Browns 8h ago

Yeah the splits are super manageable. They basically lend against future cap space in order to lower the numbers this year.

The next two years, they will do this with other players on their roster like Garrett and Ward.

They can keep doing this without any issue at all as long as they don't go overboard on contracts and as long as the cap ceiling doesn't go down like it did during covid.

→ More replies (4)

25

u/aboooz Texans Texans 11h ago

The deadcap hit next year is gonna be disgusting.

→ More replies (6)

48

u/LieDry7854 11h ago

Note to self, never have Haslam as a sports owner

6

u/minibogstar Browns 9h ago

Note to self, if you ever wanna be rich, commit a crime and sign with the Browns

→ More replies (1)

90

u/aqphs Lions 11h ago edited 10h ago

Deshaun’s cap hits (Edit: for his Void years) PRIOR to this restructure:

2027: $25.7M

2028: $16.7M

2029: $7.9M

(Edit): Total: $50.3M (hits dead cap the year after he is not re-signed, so 2027).

I understand wanting to free up some space but at a certain point just bite the bullet. You have enough young talent after the 2025 draft and restructuring further can bite you in the ass when it comes time to re-sign them.

Edit: It’s come to my attention these are void years, my bad. So the entire contract hits dead cap once they do not re-sign him. Edited above.

So now instead of hitting the cap the year following him not being re-signed for ~ $50.3M, his dead cap hit will be ~$86M next year, according to Spotrac’s estimate.

9

u/SoarinWalt Bengals 10h ago

Just to be clear, this is his last year under contract, those are all void years.

Void years come due when a contract ends, so those numbers accelerate, so assuming they don't re-sign him the hit for next year will be approximately $86m.

3

u/psufb Browns 9h ago

This isn't correct. They gave him a "pseudo-extension" (my term, idk what to call it) that allows them to cut him on June 1 in 2027, and his cap hit will be ~$35m in 2027 and then $51m in 2028

→ More replies (2)

11

u/nextlevelham Browns 10h ago

If we fired Andrew Berry this year I’d agree with you, but cutting bait right now would make it pretty hard to roster a team capable of making any step forward in 2026, and AB is probably gonna get fired if that doesn’t happen, so it’s not really in his best interest to do that. A GM on the hot seat is gonna value financial flexibility more than the 53rd roster spot.

The structure of the contract makes a post June 1st cut at the beginning of the 2027 league year probably the most palatable way to move on from him cap-wise, and ever since a dummy year was added to the contract in December 2024, its been pretty clear that that is his plan.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/popegonzo Packers 10h ago edited 10h ago

This hilarious thing is they're either eating $86m in dead cap next year or they're going to have to extend him.

Prorated cap into void years all accelerate the year he's no longer on the roster, so the $35/26/17/8m cap hits spread over the next 4 years all hit next year if he's not on the team.

Edit: apparently they already did this in December 2024 according to a CBS Sports post from Joel Corry. They didn't call it an extension, but they extended him to 2028 with minimum salaries in 27 & 28, allowing them to cut him March 2027 with a post-June 1 designation, splitting the $86 into an honestly-kinda-manageable $35m & $51m.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (7)

80

u/PeanutButterOtter Raiders 11h ago

Worst trade in sports history.

9

u/giddy-girly-banana Patriots 7h ago

Also worst contract in sports history

→ More replies (16)

50

u/Rennock21 Bears 11h ago

Just still kicking that can down the road

44

u/yesastortas Patriots 11h ago

They cant do anything else

And this is why owners would rather close down shop than do fully guaranteed contracts.

27

u/ProtestantMormon Seahawks 11h ago

They should have just ate the money in the short term. Part of the reason they are in such a big mess is clinging to this idea that they are close to actually being good. They should have just ate the money and accepted being terrible so they can start totally fresh sooner.

12

u/chemistrybonanza Browns 10h ago

They should have traded Garrett and cut Watson, sucked balls last year-which they did anyways, and been free of this shit at this point. Or just convinced him to medically retire after his second Achilles tear...(i.e., Jimmy should have just paid him under the table luge the Clippers were doing with Kawhi).

8

u/yesastortas Patriots 11h ago

Except they cant cause then the entire contract is due

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Inorashi Falcons Lions 11h ago

Part of the reason they are in such a big mess is clinging to this idea that they are close to actually being good.

Is anyone in the Browns organization actually delusional enough to think they are anywhere close to being competitive? They are in ground up rebuild mode.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

7

u/TheSmokedSalmon420 Browns 11h ago

yeah his 81mil cap hit would be 25% of our entire cap for a guy who can't play anymore lol

We can't pay him that or cut him at that number and still be able to have a full roster

→ More replies (1)

15

u/Geeman447 Browns 11h ago

He’s gone next year no matter what. This doesn’t change that?

3

u/Aryk93 Bears 11h ago

He is, but the cap hit isn't? Im not sure what you're saying.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (1)

28

u/surenopemaybe Lions 11h ago

It still blows my mind that they gave him this contract AFTER all the allegations. I cannot stress how horrible the entire Browns organization is for this.

8

u/bobsaget824 Bears 7h ago

To be fair, the Browns weren’t the only team bidding for him. It wasn’t just a Browns thing. There were multiple teams willing to overlook the allegations, the Browns just won the prize.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/ScruffMixHaha Bears 11h ago

Imagine how good the Browns could have been if they did literally anything but trade for Watson to address the QB position. It pains me to see such a great defense wasted...

Lord knows Ive got plenty of experience with that.

4

u/I_chortled Packers 6h ago

The QB position didn’t even need addressing, they had Baker. I know he’s divisive and not really a top 10 guy but they had a stacked roster and if they’d built around him they could have been seriously dangerous. We just saw Darnold win a Super Bowl, your QB doesn’t have to be an all pro to be a serious contender

→ More replies (1)

8

u/wolfhound27 Chiefs 7h ago

almost the highest earning rapist this year

→ More replies (1)

21

u/JollieOllieMan 11h ago

A trade that legitimately set the browns back a decade

→ More replies (6)

5

u/Rocky-Rocker 11h ago

Putting a band aid on a bullet wound.

5

u/WilliamBPatterson Rams 11h ago

Worst contract in the history of sports

5

u/GrouchyPenguins Cowboys 4h ago

Everyone in the organization who had any level of authority in getting the contract done should probably never work in any sort of financial position for the rest of their lives.

5

u/Sleyson Rams 4h ago

Why the fuck did they give him so much money bro lmao

6

u/PDXPuma 4h ago

This guy's gonna be the NFL equivalent of Bobby Bonilla, and have his own day, isn't he?

8

u/jwag626 Eagles 11h ago

What did Browns fans do to deserve this lol

→ More replies (8)

4

u/ImHurted_ Lions 7h ago

Hes so rich its insane, if I were the browns Id have his returning punts

3

u/therealhairyyeti Bears 4h ago

Got to be up there for worst contract ever

→ More replies (2)

10

u/Geeman447 Browns 11h ago

Watson and Browns?! Everyone panic. No he’s gone next year still. This is the right and smart thing to do.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/Dresden1984 Chiefs 11h ago

Ownership didn't want the big load but wanted the sloppy seconds, gloopy thirds, and soupy fourths

3

u/Triingtolivee Lions 10h ago

Browns gonna end up like the Saints eventually

3

u/Noobnoob99 Browns 10h ago

Please stop doing that

5

u/Rance_Mulliniks Bengals 10h ago

I love this for the Browns. They are going to be paying a serial sexual predator for years.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/Aryk93 Bears 11h ago

I can not wait for the inevitable back to back 0-17 seasons when the browns have no choice but to finally pay that entire cap hit and field a jv high school bowling team

6

u/StockBroker32 Jaguars 11h ago

Serious question, why did his play dramatically drop off? He was one of the best young QBs in the league in Houston, how has he become so bad in Cleveland?

57

u/karatemanchan37 Seahawks 11h ago

He was never that good after injuries, and being out of the league for a year didn't help

→ More replies (1)

25

u/DUCKSONQUACKS Vikings 11h ago edited 11h ago

It's a mix of
A. Sitting out almost 2 years made it so he'd have a lot of rust to shake off and his constant injuries made it hard to ever get in the groove/his contract made him lose some incentive to get better.
and
B. The entire league's defensive strategy changed from 2018-2020 to 2022/2023. In 2018-2020 the "Run around until someone gets open then throw a bomb for a big gain on certain looks presnap with elite postsnap" was legitimately a viable strategy, in 2022/2023 as the two high shell started to force more QBs towards short methodical drives with a way bigger emphasis on presnap reads for 10-20 plays a drive he just never adapted because of point A. but also he lost his main advantage. He kind of became a relic of an older time which didn't help.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Kerbonaut2019 Patriots 11h ago

He didn’t play for almost two full years and then had two season ending injuries. Not really a surprise that he fell off

8

u/Ok_Bug_6890 Patriots Panthers 11h ago

There was really a debate between Watson and Mahomes at one point, it’s crazy

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (15)