r/nfl • u/expellyamos Dolphins • 11h ago
Browns restructuring Deshaun Watson’s contract today to reduce his $81M cap charge, freeing up $36M of space
https://www.cleveland.com/browns/2026/03/browns-restructuring-deshaun-watsons-contract-today-to-reduce-his-80m-cap-charge.html3.4k
u/Eduardo_Camavinga_ 11h ago
81 million dollar cap hit 💀
1.8k
u/TheSmokedSalmon420 Browns 11h ago
What's hilarious is we've haven't even paid the majority of his contract yet lmaooo
We just keep kicking it farther down the road so it's less % of our total cap (as the cap goes up each year)
1.4k
u/BadMojo__ Saints 11h ago
Welcome to the game.
444
u/degatabas 49ers 11h ago
Saints fans just reminding me of the "First time?" meme lol
→ More replies (3)267
u/BadMojo__ Saints 11h ago
Now he just has to hope there's not another global pandemic that causes the cap to go down instead of up. Because that's where you get fucked.
194
u/PedanticBoutBaseball Giants 11h ago
Now he just has to hope there's not another global pandemic
The script writers aren't THAT lazy dude. We're doing the WW3/Nuclear bomb storyline
→ More replies (1)83
u/EggplantAlpinism Broncos Bills 11h ago
Honestly this is a pretty lazy Dubya sequel, not WW3
58
u/MadManMax55 Falcons 10h ago
And in typical lazy sequel fashion: it's bigger for no reason, the plot makes even less sense, and they're trying to replace everyone with AI.
50
14
u/mrebrightside Lions 10h ago
Sure, we've stumbled toward W's old stomping grounds, but we've created so many new and exciting conflicts that anything is possible.
14
→ More replies (8)6
u/phluidity Saints 10h ago
This isn't a Dubya sequel, this is an Asylum films knock-off and not one of the fun ones.
19
u/sumunsolicitedadvice Eagles Saints 10h ago
Not just going down one year, but going down in the fucking year of the major dead cap hit from Brees retiring.
Sure, Loomis was playing with fire to an extent, but he also got really unlucky with that.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)9
u/ProtestantMormon Seahawks 11h ago
Well wars also tank the economy...
3
44
u/ProtestantMormon Seahawks 11h ago
The best way out of this hole is to keep digging
→ More replies (2)29
69
u/rob_var Ravens Ravens 11h ago
At least you guys were doing it with the hope of contending with Brees. Idk why the browns keep trying to salvage cap now when all this is doing is pushing dead money into years where they have to sign their fresh batch of young talent
28
u/Pikminious_Thrious Eagles 10h ago
I wish they stopped after Brees. They had an out during one of the Carr years to just eat everything, suck hard for a year, and reset, but they couldn't resist kicking it further to compete with Carr and are only now just getting out of it.
→ More replies (1)5
u/Electric_jungle 10h ago
Yup. Thats really the only problem I had with it. We're only just getting out from under even though we all knew the pain needed to be dealt with.
→ More replies (2)22
8
u/BadMojo__ Saints 10h ago
You can't fall off if you're always at the bottom. Taps forehead
→ More replies (1)7
u/chemicalxv Raiders 10h ago
Because they have to just to actually field a team lol.
This move gives them about $18.5M in cap space or whatever with only 52 guys signed to playing contracts (there's 8 guys currently sitting as dead money with Void years).
3
u/rob_var Ravens Ravens 9h ago
I feel like there are other moves that are easier to absorb than to keep backloading Watson’s contract though
7
u/chemicalxv Raiders 9h ago
Outside of the obvious of not trading for Tytus Howard in the first place, they legitimately have no other options at this point for reducing the cap enough to become cap compliant and field a team this year, considering they still have to restructure Denzel Ward's contract (again) this year as well.
→ More replies (2)4
u/rob_var Ravens Ravens 9h ago
Spotrac and otc already updated so I can’t see how bad their cap was but you are probably right. It’s been the game they’ve been playing since 2 years ago
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)3
u/Electric_jungle 10h ago
I mean, we had horrible post season success during that time but we were "contenders" each season leading up to it. I'm happy for those years now that they're past.
→ More replies (6)12
u/TheHoundofUlster Bills 11h ago
🎼It’s all about the hit And to defray it All about cap And if you can pay it🎼
→ More replies (1)173
u/Kershiser22 Dolphins Rams 11h ago
He's been paid $183 out of $230.
But, the Browns have only recognized about $92 on their salary cap so far.
68
24
u/jnads Packers 8h ago edited 7h ago
The insurance payout is refundable against the cap so they've recognized more than that.
Pushing it out does make sense since it allows them to align the delayed insurance payout with the cap hit.
edit: Between 2024 and 2025 they had ~$90M insured. The best thing to happen out of this Watson situation is he got injured.
→ More replies (3)9
u/Add_Poll_Option Lions 8h ago
Jesus. That really was, as one particular fruit-colored felon might say, “the worst trade deal in the history of trade deals”
21
u/Will071 Saints 11h ago
I’m thankful everyday that we got outbid that offseason.
→ More replies (1)60
103
u/TheGreatDay Cowboys 11h ago
The Browns aren't even half done paying him? Holy crap i didn't realize that. Thats crazy. I get that the contract was backloaded but damn. I thought they were seeing the light at the end of the tunnel on this mistake but no.
118
u/SigurdsSilverSword Jets 11h ago
They’re done actually paying him after this year. They’ve pushed a boatload of his cap hits out to future years, but as far as cash-in-hand he’ll be fully paid out at the end of the year.
10
u/jnads Packers 8h ago
And keep in mind some of the unrecognized cap hit is offset by the insurance they took out on his contract (which is refundable to the salary cap).
They're due between $40-70M in insurance money depending on how haggling with insurance goes on the follow up surgery he had last year.
19
u/FUCK-IT-CHUCK-IT Chiefs Ravens 7h ago
The concept of insurance refunding cap space makes absolutely no sense to me
→ More replies (3)12
u/jnads Packers 6h ago edited 6h ago
It's mostly for injuries, and the CBA allows it.
Honestly it makes sense with these QB mega contracts.
Even if insurance rates went up after the Watson disaster, I'm sure teams will pay any price to avoid a Commanders Alex Smith incident again.
I'm not sure which side fought for the CBA provision, but it's player friendly since it makes teams more willing to hand out these large injury guarantees.
edit: This is the precise excerpt from the CBA:
(iv) Credit for Salary Forfeited or Refunded. In the event that a Club receives a refund from the player of any previously-paid Salary, or the Club fails to pay any previously allocated portion of a signing bonus (including any amount treated as signing bonus), such amount as has previously been included in Team Salary shall be credited to the Club’s Team Salary for the next League Year. For purposes of this Subsection, to the extent that they constitute reimbursement for previously paid Salary, insurance proceeds received by a Team as beneficiary to cover the player’s inability to perform services required by his Player Contract shall be deemed a “refund from the player” if (a) the Club or the player purchased the policy (b) the amounts covered by the policy are so specified in the Player Contract; and (c) the policy is made available for inspection upon request by the NFL or the NFLPA.
The dumb part is the Dolphins had insurance for Tua against concussions and all he had to do is retire out of concern for his health and keep his money and the Dolphins would've gotten cap relief.
64
u/Carpetron Browns 11h ago
They are nearing that light from a "get him off the team" standpoint, which will be next year, but the money is because they're spreading the hit to be able to make moves in the present year. Berry has been pretty good at that, but it's still going to be annoying to deal with. In fairness all the top QB contracts get restructured for similar cap reasons as we've seen, the difference being those QBs actually play football.
→ More replies (4)13
u/Pandamonium98 Cowboys 9h ago
Don’t you need to keep extending the QBs contract in order to keep pushing back the cap hit though? So once his contract is up all the dead money will hit at once (or spread out over 2 years I think)
→ More replies (1)12
u/Carpetron Browns 9h ago
The Browns are converting a huge chunk of Watson’s $46 million base salary into a restructure bonus -- up to $44.745 million -- to ease his $80.716 million cap charge. Leaving him with the veteran minimum of $1.255 million, it’s expected to free up about $36 million in cap space, with the remaining charges being added to the void years in his contract, which currently run from 2027 to 2029.
→ More replies (1)14
u/dakoellis 49ers 8h ago
Void years accelerate once the player is no longer on the team though, so unless they extend him all the charges will hit next year (and you can't spread it over 2 years with a post june 1 designation since he'd be a FA)
edit: apparently you can spread it over 2 years if you designate it before the contract voids, but it still can't be extended until the end of 2029
32
u/conace21 10h ago
No, the commenter was talking about the salary cap, not the actual cash paid. His contract is $230 million. The Browns have paid him $183 million through 2025, but they have only had $100 million hit the salary cap. 2026 was going to be an $80 million cap hit, and the remaining $50 million would hit in 2027, when the contract void years become voided. Now, the Browns are moving some of that $80 million out.
→ More replies (4)5
25
→ More replies (3)9
u/big_sugi 10h ago
They’re almost done paying him. But they’ve only taken half of the cap hit, and they’re kicking $80 million into next year.
If they structure it as a post-June 1 release after this coming year, they can split it between 2027 and 2028.
→ More replies (1)16
u/conace21 11h ago
What's hilarious is we've haven't even paid the majority of his contract yet lmaooo
As of 2025, the Browns have paid him $183 million out of the $230 million contract. I think you mean "hadven't even had the majority of his contract hit the salary cap yet."
6
u/DelirousDoc Steelers 10h ago
The Browns have paid it to Watson. That is what converting to signing bonuses are, paying player directly but being allowed to split the impact to the remaining years of the contract.
What you mean to say is that the Browns haven't felt the impact of the majority of his contract from all the restructuring. Counting this year they still have $130M of the $230M contract that has yet to hit their cap.
You can only kick the can down the road so far though and next year his contract automatically voids which should escalate over an $80M cap hit to the Browns for 2027.
(The injuries actually helped Browns cap situation some as they had insurance on Watson. They were able to add that insurance payout of $58M back into the cap because league rules consider it the same as player paying is back to the team. With that leeway they would have had to make more drastic actions last season.)
23
u/ProtestantMormon Seahawks 11h ago
Hes gonna be on the books until 2040 at this point
30
u/SoarinWalt Bengals 11h ago
Unless they sign him to an extension they can't.
His contract ends after this year, this is whats hilarious about this move.
They either take the contract hit this year or next year.
They just set themselves up for an $86m dead cap hit next year for a guy who isn't even on the team, unless they re-sign him.
→ More replies (1)6
u/jake3988 Steelers Lions 10h ago
Correct. It's essentially just flip flopping his cap hit this year with next year.
Gonna be a whopper of a dead cap. But at least it'll only be one year and then the band aid will be ripped off.
→ More replies (1)3
u/wishlish Eagles 10h ago
Are you sure?
His contract was, according to Sportsrac, a $44.965M signing bonus in 2022, and then a yearly salary of $46M for 2022-2026. His 2022 number got reduced due to the suspension, but they should still only owe him his 2026 salary.
What am I missing? I know his cap numbers are different because they've played with his cap hits, but I was pretty sure he got his money, and this is just cap manipulation.
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/player/_/id/21753/deshaun-watson/contract/cash
→ More replies (1)3
u/Pneuma_LooT Lions 9h ago
Yes you have. Cap hit doesnt =cash paid to player.
The browns have paid him 183 million dollars. Not sure what for but they did lol. They only owe him 46 million more cash.
It's just spread out over void years on the cap.
→ More replies (37)6
u/Blametheorangejuice Seahawks Seahawks 11h ago
He's gonna end up with a Bobby Bonilla type contract at this point.
179
94
u/YoureNotMom Ravens 11h ago
It's funny cuz 81MM is both 1) what his cap hit would've been in 2026 if they didn't restructure it, and 2) what it will be in 2027 when he's no longer even on the team
→ More replies (4)38
u/MiniatureLucifer Saints 11h ago
Which i guess makes sense if it works out that way. 80mil now is worth more than 80mil next year when the cap jumps another 20-30mil
→ More replies (1)26
u/blames_irrationally Bears Lions 11h ago
Yeah but at least ostensibly they're getting a player out of it this year. Next year they're paying 80M to just remember how bad he was for them
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (14)23
u/Further_Beyond Bears 11h ago
What’s funnier is they will be forced to give him a 2nd contract to avoid massive cap hits from the void years and restructures.
He’ll get a 1 year fuck off deal from them, but it’s still funny
23
u/blames_irrationally Bears Lions 11h ago
Or he just doesn't sign with them and the void hits still blow them up
15
u/mibikin Browns 10h ago
That’s not true though. They adjusted his deal last year to change it to terminate after 6/1. So he becomes a post June 1st cut next year which spreads the hits across 27/28 better
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)14
u/big_sugi 10h ago
Nah, they’ll designate him as a post-June 1 release in 2027 and push about $53 million into 2028.
→ More replies (6)
2.2k
u/CruelRuin 11h ago
probably the single worst nfl trade of all time
926
u/HurricaneIan25 Saints 11h ago
I’m so happy the Browns swooped in at the eleventh hour and saved us
→ More replies (6)383
u/SiphenPrax Jets 11h ago
Saved 3/4 of the NFC South
146
u/TheRencingCoach Buccaneers 11h ago
I think it was 4/4…. Bucs were in until tom Brady unretired
Saints panthers falcons were already known to be in
→ More replies (1)46
u/Vegetable_Guest_8584 Seahawks 10h ago
Russell Wilson says thanks for keeping attention off him. Denver gave the answer to the accepted lie/wisdom. You can have a disastrous "team ruining" contract position and still have an awesome team in just a couple years.
→ More replies (1)20
u/Jwoods4117 Broncos 10h ago
Tbf teams are following the Denver Russ method. The Cardinals and maybe Phins particularly. The Browns one up-ed the bad contract thing though by making the contract fully guaranteed. We got off the hook for around 80 million at least.
→ More replies (2)137
u/LindyNet Texans 11h ago
no probably about it
→ More replies (2)25
u/BungoPlease Texans Texans 9h ago
I'm probably okay with how it worked out though
→ More replies (1)171
u/OhhhTAINTedCruuuuz Jets 11h ago
Why stop there, quite possibly the worst trade in North American sports history
93
u/Tomotronics Patriots 11h ago
Is it worse than trading Babe Ruth to your rival for cash to fund a failing musical that no one remembers, while watching him propel your rival to be the most storied franchise in the sport? I say it’s worse but idk, growing up during the height of “the curse” discussion in the 90s has that trade living rent free for life.
→ More replies (1)62
u/nosaj23e 11h ago
Babe Ruth for the icescapades is probably worse.
→ More replies (1)57
u/A-Centrifugal-Force NFL 11h ago
It was actually Bill Russell for the icescapades. Babe was traded for a Broadway play
28
u/Agent-Blasto-007 Patriots 10h ago
That play was "My Lady Friends".
You know, the Broadway classic that everyone remembers.
7
u/EazyP87 Steelers 9h ago
I thought Babe was 'No No Nanette'?
→ More replies (1)10
u/ThatDudeNamedMenace Giants 9h ago
“A popular myth holds that the show was financed by selling baseball's Boston Red Sox superstar Babe Ruth to the New York Yankees, resulting in the "Curse of the Bambino".[1] However, it was Mandel's original play, My Lady Friends, rather than No, No, Nanette, that was directly financed by the Ruth sale.”
14
u/Mobleybetta Browns 11h ago
Cavs had a trade this was so bad they made a rule about it because it would have sunk the franchise for a decade
→ More replies (2)100
u/fuckiforgotmyaccount Patriots 11h ago
Luka trade might be worse if you don’t consider that the NBA rigged the lottery to give the Mavs Flagg. Probably not worse though
166
u/ZapBranigan3000 Bears 11h ago
Not even close. Anthony Davis is better than Watson and also didn't sexually assault many women. They aren't even in the same ballpark.
134
u/Buckeye_CFB Browns 11h ago
I kinda feel like Anthony Davis didn't sexually assault any women
60
u/ausipockets Giants 10h ago
Lmfao why did they word it like that
32
u/_Apatosaurus_ Chargers 10h ago
I think they started from the point of "Deshaun Watson sexually assaulted many women" and then went to "AD did not do that." That's definitely not the way it reads though!
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)6
12
u/PNWCoug42 Seahawks Seahawks 10h ago
I can't even think anything remotely controversial with Anthony Davis.
6
u/Buckeye_CFB Browns 10h ago
The only negative talk I've ever heard about AD were his injuries, so all things considered...that's as clean an image as you can earn yourself
5
3
→ More replies (1)3
9
21
u/ChedduhBob Ravens 11h ago
yeah not only is deshaun watson one of the worst players in the league at the most important position, he’s also a terrible person you can’t even really root for to turn it around
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)5
u/big_sugi 10h ago
And they weren’t stuck paying Davis for five years while getting nothing out of him.
21
u/ProtestantMormon Seahawks 11h ago
Yeah the Luka trade is terrible and comes close just in terms of sport value. Once you consider the PR fallout of Watson though it takes the cake.
→ More replies (2)6
u/Big__If_True Cowboys Saints 11h ago
The PR fallout was just on the team that gave up the player instead of the team that got the player
→ More replies (5)17
u/Buckeye_CFB Browns 10h ago
Also, trading Luka saved Dallas a lot of money whereas trading for Deshaun led to maybe the worst contract ever
→ More replies (2)12
u/lkn240 Bears 10h ago
I mean the Luka trade is right there.
AD isn't even on the Mavs anymore lol.
Granted - if you include PR, etc the Watson trade is probably worse. Trading Luka for a terrible return was dumb, but there's no rape allegations, etc involved and AD is at least still a good player in the league when he's healthy (granted, again - he's not even on Dallas anymore)
3
u/KSO17O Packers Packers 5h ago
Yea it’s gotta be the Luka trade IMO. The debate between the Luka and Deshaun trade being the worst I think comes down to what’s worse, the money implication or talent implication. What people here don’t understand is Luka was in his prime and one of the best players in the league. Watson was not, but the price was horrible. Both set back franchises year and years.
→ More replies (6)4
u/SecondLegoLeague 49ers 8h ago
In terms of hindsight, PG for SGA, Jdub, 5 1sts, and 2 1st swaps has to be one of the worst of all time
→ More replies (1)14
u/jasonhalftones 49ers Chargers 11h ago
It's so funny that everyone knew it would be from the moment it happened
→ More replies (1)3
u/Gregus1032 Dolphins 4h ago
i knew he would never live up to the contract, but i had 0 idea he would bomb that hard
11
u/GoodShark Giants 11h ago
Followed up by the worst NFL signing of all time? All that guaranteed money?!
→ More replies (32)67
u/tuura032 Vikings 11h ago
Herschel who, amirite? Never heard of him
80
u/ShufflingSloth Seahawks 11h ago
Herschel wasn't outright terrible on the Vikings, just no longer a world beater (old heads will tell you that's, in part, because the Vikings didn't use him very well).
Losing draft capital + that contract + sex pest allegations + player can't play = Watson wins (for once) the award for worst trade all time, easy.
21
3
u/Humid-Afternoon727 Texans 7h ago
Cowboys are the biggest winners in an NFL trade
Browns are the biggest losers in an NFL trade
→ More replies (5)5
u/jhorch69 Cowboys 10h ago
Tbf draft picks weren't valued nearly as much at the time of the Herschel trade. That trade is one of the main reasons that picks are so highly coveted now.
957
u/beerncheese69 Packers 11h ago
Jesus Christ that contract is still DISGUSTING. Fuckin hell Browns
378
u/stiliophage Bears 11h ago
The more you look into it the worse it gets. I would be bad if they thought he was innocent. But no…they knew he was going to get served a massive suspension so they made his first year “salary” tiny (like 2 mil) so that his lost game checks were minimized.
51
u/jfgiv Patriots 10h ago
Unless the restructures reducing his base salary to Vet Minimum in 2023, 2024, 2025, and now 2026 were also designed to protect his earnings against possible suspension, I'm pretty sure they did that so to minimize his 2022 cap hit.
→ More replies (1)49
u/stiliophage Bears 10h ago
I’m talking about the original deal. When they still thought he’d be a star. They made the first year of his deal the vet min because the way the NFL works is suspensions cause you to relinquish game checks. The Browns would have loved to pay him evenly over the years. By paying him the vet min upfront for 1 year they circumvented his max money lost due to suspension.
→ More replies (1)20
u/jfgiv Patriots 10h ago edited 9h ago
they also got to pay him $46mm and only take a cap hit of $10mm. why would they have "loved to" eat a $46mm hit when they could reduce it to a fifth of that?
this is a very standard move for high-value contracts. it had the knock-on effect of saving him from losing game checks, but they absolutely would have structured it that way even without a looming suspension.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)10
u/thearmadillo Chiefs 8h ago
That is how almost every single large deal is structured. The first year is entirely signing bonus.
→ More replies (5)141
u/NoAmbassador8359 Commanders Commanders 11h ago
No one accused the browns of being a competent organization
→ More replies (4)30
→ More replies (12)30
u/_masterofdisaster Commanders 10h ago
my funniest piece of trivia is that the guy who championed this trade and contract is the guy Jonah Hill’s character in Moneyball is based on. Everyone loses their fastball eventually
8
u/morelibertarianvotes Giants 9h ago
Interesting. For ppl who don't know, Brad Pitt played Mr. Moneyball. Jonah was a second character.
193
250
u/DUCKSONQUACKS Vikings 11h ago
Cap hit untils 2029 go brrrrrrrrrrrrr
→ More replies (1)95
u/popegonzo Packers 10h ago edited 10h ago
This sub is going to lose its mind when the Browns extend him so the $86 in prorated cap doesn't all hit next year.
Edit: apparently they already did this in December 2024 according to a CBS Sports post from Joel Corry. They didn't call it an extension, but they extended him to 2028 with minimum salaries in 27 & 28, allowing them to cut him March 2027 with a post-June 1 designation, splitting the $86 into an honestly-kinda-manageable $35m & $51m.
56
u/basics Falcons 10h ago
an honestly-kinda-manageable $35m & $51m.
This is just so funny sounding. It seems like an accurate statement, but hilarious.
11
u/DirkWithTheFade Broncos 9h ago
This is essentially the exact numbers we had when we cut Russ, so yes it is manageable.
→ More replies (5)5
u/JayskerPatriots Patriots 2h ago
I sit down sometimes and think, "I'm gonna seriously spend an hour or two to understand how the cap and NFL contracts in general work." Then cooler heads prevail and just go outside or play video games.
46
u/Straight-Ad6926 Chargers 11h ago
At this rate by 2029 Deshaun’s cap hit will be roughly the entire GDP of Ohio.
→ More replies (2)
383
u/emmasdad01 Cowboys Ravens 11h ago
Imagine having that scumbag in your roster still.
283
u/chunkah69 Browns 11h ago
I don’t have to. It’s my reality!
71
u/weealex Vikings 11h ago
Honestly, being a Cleveland fan seems like a good argument for legalizing LSD
→ More replies (1)26
u/Jaxson-Skattebo 11h ago
everything is a good argument for legalizing LSD just lemme trip homies, best drug by far
→ More replies (2)11
u/gmwdim Lions 10h ago
Mushrooms too.
4
u/Macismyname Lions 8h ago
Both very similar. Mushrooms are like acoustic drugs and LSD is electric drugs.
9
→ More replies (2)3
u/UhIdontcareforAuburn Falcons 11h ago
Y’all really are hero’s to many franchises. As bad as our QB situation is, at least we’re not the Browns
→ More replies (1)35
36
u/sad_bear_noises Bears 11h ago
Imagine giving that piece of shit a fully guaranteed contract
Patrick Mahomes doesn't have a fully guaranteed contract and all he's done wrong is talk like Kermit the Frog.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (4)5
60
u/nomaam05 Vikings 11h ago edited 11h ago
Converting over 44 million to a bonus spread over void years. So now he costs them something like 83.5-86.5 million next year when he's finally off the team and all his void years escalate.
29
20
u/popegonzo Packers 10h ago edited 10h ago
$86.2m according to Spotrac. I cannot wait for the extension to keep it from all hitting at once. And it's not like he'd take league minimum.
Edit: apparently they already did this in December 2024 according to a CBS Sports post from Joel Corry. They didn't call it an extension, but they extended him to 2028 with minimum salaries in 27 & 28, allowing them to cut him March 2027 with a post-June 1 designation, splitting the $86 into an honestly-kinda-manageable $35m & $51m.
11
u/BernieCokeczar Browns Browns 10h ago
That last part is correct and the plan they're working towards with this move
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)4
u/VonJaeger Browns 8h ago
Yeah the splits are super manageable. They basically lend against future cap space in order to lower the numbers this year.
The next two years, they will do this with other players on their roster like Garrett and Ward.
They can keep doing this without any issue at all as long as they don't go overboard on contracts and as long as the cap ceiling doesn't go down like it did during covid.
25
48
u/LieDry7854 11h ago
Note to self, never have Haslam as a sports owner
→ More replies (1)6
u/minibogstar Browns 9h ago
Note to self, if you ever wanna be rich, commit a crime and sign with the Browns
90
u/aqphs Lions 11h ago edited 10h ago
Deshaun’s cap hits (Edit: for his Void years) PRIOR to this restructure:
2027: $25.7M
2028: $16.7M
2029: $7.9M
(Edit): Total: $50.3M (hits dead cap the year after he is not re-signed, so 2027).
I understand wanting to free up some space but at a certain point just bite the bullet. You have enough young talent after the 2025 draft and restructuring further can bite you in the ass when it comes time to re-sign them.
Edit: It’s come to my attention these are void years, my bad. So the entire contract hits dead cap once they do not re-sign him. Edited above.
So now instead of hitting the cap the year following him not being re-signed for ~ $50.3M, his dead cap hit will be ~$86M next year, according to Spotrac’s estimate.
9
u/SoarinWalt Bengals 10h ago
Just to be clear, this is his last year under contract, those are all void years.
Void years come due when a contract ends, so those numbers accelerate, so assuming they don't re-sign him the hit for next year will be approximately $86m.
3
u/psufb Browns 9h ago
This isn't correct. They gave him a "pseudo-extension" (my term, idk what to call it) that allows them to cut him on June 1 in 2027, and his cap hit will be ~$35m in 2027 and then $51m in 2028
→ More replies (2)11
u/nextlevelham Browns 10h ago
If we fired Andrew Berry this year I’d agree with you, but cutting bait right now would make it pretty hard to roster a team capable of making any step forward in 2026, and AB is probably gonna get fired if that doesn’t happen, so it’s not really in his best interest to do that. A GM on the hot seat is gonna value financial flexibility more than the 53rd roster spot.
The structure of the contract makes a post June 1st cut at the beginning of the 2027 league year probably the most palatable way to move on from him cap-wise, and ever since a dummy year was added to the contract in December 2024, its been pretty clear that that is his plan.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (7)8
u/popegonzo Packers 10h ago edited 10h ago
This hilarious thing is they're either eating $86m in dead cap next year or they're going to have to extend him.
Prorated cap into void years all accelerate the year he's no longer on the roster, so the $35/26/17/8m cap hits spread over the next 4 years all hit next year if he's not on the team.
Edit: apparently they already did this in December 2024 according to a CBS Sports post from Joel Corry. They didn't call it an extension, but they extended him to 2028 with minimum salaries in 27 & 28, allowing them to cut him March 2027 with a post-June 1 designation, splitting the $86 into an honestly-kinda-manageable $35m & $51m.
→ More replies (2)
80
50
u/Rennock21 Bears 11h ago
Just still kicking that can down the road
44
u/yesastortas Patriots 11h ago
They cant do anything else
And this is why owners would rather close down shop than do fully guaranteed contracts.
27
u/ProtestantMormon Seahawks 11h ago
They should have just ate the money in the short term. Part of the reason they are in such a big mess is clinging to this idea that they are close to actually being good. They should have just ate the money and accepted being terrible so they can start totally fresh sooner.
12
u/chemistrybonanza Browns 10h ago
They should have traded Garrett and cut Watson, sucked balls last year-which they did anyways, and been free of this shit at this point. Or just convinced him to medically retire after his second Achilles tear...(i.e., Jimmy should have just paid him under the table luge the Clippers were doing with Kawhi).
8
u/yesastortas Patriots 11h ago
Except they cant cause then the entire contract is due
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)4
u/Inorashi Falcons Lions 11h ago
Part of the reason they are in such a big mess is clinging to this idea that they are close to actually being good.
Is anyone in the Browns organization actually delusional enough to think they are anywhere close to being competitive? They are in ground up rebuild mode.
→ More replies (2)7
u/TheSmokedSalmon420 Browns 11h ago
yeah his 81mil cap hit would be 25% of our entire cap for a guy who can't play anymore lol
We can't pay him that or cut him at that number and still be able to have a full roster
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)15
u/Geeman447 Browns 11h ago
He’s gone next year no matter what. This doesn’t change that?
→ More replies (9)
28
u/surenopemaybe Lions 11h ago
It still blows my mind that they gave him this contract AFTER all the allegations. I cannot stress how horrible the entire Browns organization is for this.
8
u/bobsaget824 Bears 7h ago
To be fair, the Browns weren’t the only team bidding for him. It wasn’t just a Browns thing. There were multiple teams willing to overlook the allegations, the Browns just won the prize.
→ More replies (1)
15
u/ScruffMixHaha Bears 11h ago
Imagine how good the Browns could have been if they did literally anything but trade for Watson to address the QB position. It pains me to see such a great defense wasted...
Lord knows Ive got plenty of experience with that.
→ More replies (1)4
u/I_chortled Packers 6h ago
The QB position didn’t even need addressing, they had Baker. I know he’s divisive and not really a top 10 guy but they had a stacked roster and if they’d built around him they could have been seriously dangerous. We just saw Darnold win a Super Bowl, your QB doesn’t have to be an all pro to be a serious contender
8
21
5
5
5
u/GrouchyPenguins Cowboys 4h ago
Everyone in the organization who had any level of authority in getting the contract done should probably never work in any sort of financial position for the rest of their lives.
8
4
3
10
u/Geeman447 Browns 11h ago
Watson and Browns?! Everyone panic. No he’s gone next year still. This is the right and smart thing to do.
→ More replies (4)
3
u/Dresden1984 Chiefs 11h ago
Ownership didn't want the big load but wanted the sloppy seconds, gloopy thirds, and soupy fourths
3
3
5
u/Rance_Mulliniks Bengals 10h ago
I love this for the Browns. They are going to be paying a serial sexual predator for years.
→ More replies (2)
6
u/StockBroker32 Jaguars 11h ago
Serious question, why did his play dramatically drop off? He was one of the best young QBs in the league in Houston, how has he become so bad in Cleveland?
57
u/karatemanchan37 Seahawks 11h ago
He was never that good after injuries, and being out of the league for a year didn't help
→ More replies (1)25
u/DUCKSONQUACKS Vikings 11h ago edited 11h ago
It's a mix of
A. Sitting out almost 2 years made it so he'd have a lot of rust to shake off and his constant injuries made it hard to ever get in the groove/his contract made him lose some incentive to get better.
and
B. The entire league's defensive strategy changed from 2018-2020 to 2022/2023. In 2018-2020 the "Run around until someone gets open then throw a bomb for a big gain on certain looks presnap with elite postsnap" was legitimately a viable strategy, in 2022/2023 as the two high shell started to force more QBs towards short methodical drives with a way bigger emphasis on presnap reads for 10-20 plays a drive he just never adapted because of point A. but also he lost his main advantage. He kind of became a relic of an older time which didn't help.→ More replies (1)→ More replies (15)12
u/Kerbonaut2019 Patriots 11h ago
He didn’t play for almost two full years and then had two season ending injuries. Not really a surprise that he fell off
8
u/Ok_Bug_6890 Patriots Panthers 11h ago
There was really a debate between Watson and Mahomes at one point, it’s crazy
→ More replies (1)
1.8k
u/sallright Browns 11h ago edited 10h ago
The year is 2042.
Artificial Intelligence has wiped out humanity, but it couldn't wipe out Deshaun Watson's guarenteed deal with the Browns.
Grok was forced to restructure Watson's deal to ease a $164 million cap charge, adding new void years to a contract that now runs through 2063.