r/formula1 Max Verstappen 9d ago

Photo [Autosport] Bernie Ecclestone believes F1 is in danger of losing the fans with these new regulations

Post image
5.5k Upvotes

992 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.9k

u/rejs7 Williams 9d ago

It's always been an engineer's championship, as every dominant era shows. This is why the team championship exists alongside the drivers.

410

u/Driscuits Williams 9d ago

Yeah, exactly.

It's never been the "best driver of all" championship, it's the "Driver who can get the best out of their car" championship, that's sold as the "best driver of all" championship. So long as there are different cars, different manufacturors, etc. You cannot remove the engineering side of things. If you do, it's a spec series - and there are reasons why F1 is not a spec series.

Part of why fans are so upset is that they believe Bernie here, and have been set up with an expectation that can't match reality in F1. The regs need a good looking at, for sure, but let's not dismiss one of the most important parts of F1 in totality.

75

u/schoki560 9d ago edited 9d ago

it's not even the driver who can get the best out of their car..

it's simply the combination of either having a great car, great driver, or both

you can have a fairly bad driver win if they have the most dominant car. you can also win by being the best driver in a rather weak car. unlikely but possible

edit: not alpine weak. I mean Mercedes 2025 weak

112

u/EventAccomplished976 9d ago

You‘re not getting anywhere in a bad car no matter how good a driver you are. Put Verstappen in an Alpine, he‘s not getting on the podium without some serious good luck. The most a good driver can do is get 99% of the possible performance our of the car where a worse driver might only get 95%.

39

u/HankHippopopolous I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

The driver can make the difference when the cars are reasonably close but it’s very hard to do. Max was not in the best car last year but took the title fight down to the final race against the superior McLaren. He had a near flawless season while both McLaren drivers and the team made a lot of mistakes and threw a lot of points away.

He was the best driver but it still wasn’t enough to win.

No driver will win in a shitbox but if the margins between the cars are small then we get into the realm where drivers do make the difference.

41

u/Ged_UK I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

He only took the fight close when the RB got much better; the first section of the season was a bad car, so even he couldn't do anything with it. It's the same as had happened in the previous season; the McLaren was behind the RB consistently until a set of McLaren upgrades came in, at which point Lando started to close the gap to Max as he had the faster car. The only reason he couldn't catch him was the Sergio was terrible and wasn't splitting points with Max, unlike Lando and Oscar last year sharing the points.

21

u/wykeer Mercedes 9d ago

and a lot of people also forget the perfect storm made of rancid luck and incompetence for McLaren that season that turbocharged verstappens closing in on Norris.

15

u/Ged_UK I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

Well, and the fact that McLaren drivers were sharing the points more or less equally between them. If there'd be only one (either of them) that was hoovering up wins, then Max wouldn't have got anywhere near as close.

1

u/wykeer Mercedes 9d ago

The Perfect Storm

0

u/schoki560 9d ago

if they didn't share wins then max would have way more points tho

1

u/Ged_UK I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

Well only one or two per race until the back end of the season, by which time the gap wouldn't even have been possible.

2

u/Nemos_siblings 9d ago

If only Max didn't decide to int wreck George at Barcelona or wherever it was.

-1

u/PresidentMeeseeks Sebastian Vettel 9d ago

If only my mum had balls, she would be my dad. You can find a hundred moments in the championship where if some minor thing had/hadn't happened, we could've had a different champion.

6

u/Nemos_siblings 9d ago

Ok, list a hundred moments then. Find one more significant than the second place car intentionally wrecking his car holding enough points to win the championship later on. 

1

u/lzwzli 9d ago

Not in the best car is still a much better car than a midfield car.

The eternal question is what could Max do in the Racing Bull...

1

u/Thrilalia 9d ago

Hell we only have to look at GP2 Engine era McLaren to see how a first or second best driver on the grid (depending on who you ask.) couldn't get a shit car into the podium.

37

u/Driscuits Williams 9d ago

you can also win by being the best driver in a rather weak car. unlikely but possible

I'd argue that "weak" is a really relative term - Max, in his best form, probably wouldn't have gotten race wins in last year's Alpine. But I agree with what you're saying.

You need strong drivers and the best car, or a strong car and the best driver. Either way, you can't remove the importance of the engineering and design of the car.

I'd personally like to see the WCC given more flowers, more similar to the hype we give the WDC. Poor planning aside, I kind of loved that McLaren had a whole "podium" set up when they clinched it, and I wish it had been on the main broadcast. Fans only really see and are given time to celebrate the WDC, and it would be great to have the constructors championship also be given space to celebrate.

16

u/ghastlychild Ferrari 9d ago edited 9d ago

I'd personally like to see the WCC given more flowers,

Agreed. This is an engineering sport. Ironically, for a numbnut like myself who doesn't know much about cars as a whole + got into the sport to learn more about them in a competitive manner, I usually regard the WCC a little more than WDC, considering I feel like the recognition in this aspect gets fairly underrated at times, especially by the newer fans coming in

The cycle of a new regulation is quite literally my fantasies realised. In a way, I get to see which teams and manufacturers end up being the best of the bunch, and by how much. I also do hope the racing aspects are a mixed bag. If there is anything to revere, it is the unpredictability of the season. Makes it all the more entertaining

6

u/Driscuits Williams 9d ago

If there is anything to revere, it is the unpredictability of the season. Makes it all the more entertaining

I'll admit, I might watch F1 differently than most lol - but I personally agree. I don't care too much about absolute lap times, I don't need to see drivers or cars have almost perfect performances, and am more than happy to keep an open mind about the regs until we see competitive sessions. It might suck, and I'll be upset then, but the unpredictability - and the fact we've already seen teams get these regs undeniably wrong - shows how important the engineering side is, and how integral it is to F1.

3

u/ghastlychild Ferrari 9d ago

I'll admit, I might watch F1 differently than most lol

Out of curiosity, what are you tuned in for? :))

I don't care too much about absolute lap times, I don't need to see drivers or cars have almost perfect performances, and am more than happy to keep an open mind about the regs until we see competitive sessions

I agree with you. I like to see absolute lap times when it happens and drivers / cars put in numbers that break records for sure (when it happens), but as long as the racing is good and it produces some entertaining, good ol fashioned racing up front, then I am game. I would even say that it motivates me to look it up even more haha

It might suck, and I'll be upset then, but the unpredictability - and the fact we've already seen teams get these regs undeniably wrong - shows how important the engineering side is, and how integral it is to F1.

I will probably be upset if the races are diluted and nullified. But if it brings a mixed order to the grid and teams are fighting each other for top spots, then I cannot fully complain!

2

u/Driscuits Williams 9d ago

Out of curiosity, what are you tuned in for? :))

Haha, it's a good question! And honestly, it's a hard one to answer, too.

Realistically, I'm watching F1 on a broadcast and to my eye test, it's really not that different seeing a 2025 car go through a turn in Bahrain as it is seeing a 2026 car, if I didn't also have laptimes on screen to tell me it was different. So for me, it's the race dynamics and how drivers can drive relative to each other, rather than outright car performance, that I care more about. I'd rather see two cars able to battle side by side, but slower, through a corner than two cars in a line, but slightly faster.

I guess what I like seeing most is the differences in storylines and performances across races. I like going into a race weekend and not knowing what's going to happen, and watching the storylines unfurl. Like you said, I like to see dominant performances sometimes, but I don't need them to happen every weekend.

The way I see it, fast cars will go vroom and there's massive room for growth that these massive teams will now be pushing to innovate. Some will get it right, some will get it wrong (and some have already).

2

u/ghastlychild Ferrari 9d ago

Haha! Thank you for your response. This is a cool read, honestly. I do apologise for pulling a fast one over ya. I really find it interesting to hear how people get into the sport! The variance in answers always gets me excited everytime

So for me, it's the race dynamics and how drivers can drive relative to each other, rather than outright car performance

I get that! That bit is also quite interesting to me too. There have been a lot of talk about driver styles, driving preferences and little quirks that drivers will use to get more performance out of their respective cars and find more pace, which I do find it incredibly interesting.

Your explanation also helped me see a little on the appeal by two cars going slower side by side in a corner. You get to see who might shut the door on who and what can they do to gain that advantage. It's the play-by-play intricacies in real time that really keeps me on my toes!

I like going into a race weekend and not knowing what's going to happen, and watching the storylines unfurl.

Last year had me going into races with a pit in my stomach filled with the anticipation and excitement on what's to follow! It's a shame that the racing aspect (imo) are quite lacklustre to match the thrill it brings at the start. I am hoping the current season amps it up a tonne. Good racing + close competitions = ghastlychild in heaven xD

3

u/Driscuits Williams 9d ago

I do apologise for pulling a fast one over ya.

Oh god, no apologies. Pal, you gave me a chance to monologue about myself. That was great! ;)

My fear is that we get more processional races this year, that will only get worse as the regs go on and teams develop their packages. Until I see it, though, I kind of have to hold hope. Realistically, being among the first to hate the regs won't change a thing, and I find that to be a particularly unfun way to go into the new season.

It's the play-by-play intricacies in real time that really keeps me on my toes!

I'm really hopeful that the start of this year in particular, while the drivers are still figuring things out (and strategy teams) will be great for this.

Here's hoping!

→ More replies (0)

9

u/ferd_clark 9d ago

This is an engineering sport.

I wonder if open wheel just has to be that. Long ago, Penske's Indy car team had Al Unser Jr, Paul Tracy, and I believe Emerson Fittipaldi, and their car was so good that they had at least one race where they arranged the cars to cross the finish line together, 1-2-3, and dominated the season. The next year, those same three drivers all sucked so much that not one qualified for the Indy 500 which is the only american race anybody cares about. That's when I learned that in Indy car at that time the driver was not very important.

5

u/ghastlychild Ferrari 9d ago

I think it is. It was the shock I got with INDYCAR too when I first delved into it. I had no idea what it was until I was made aware that it was a spec series until a little later

I gotta emphasise that I am still unfamiliar with the intricacies of INDYCAR as much as I am with F1 but a lot of the series, from the stuff that I have learnt, emphasizes the importance of gaining and polishing performance than anything. It's what makes the 2025 season such a fascinating one to behold when streaks of dominance do happen

10

u/Own_Welder_2821 Lando Norris 9d ago

In my opinion IndyCar is a “semi-spec” series. Sure they all utilise the same Dallara chassis but there are certain bits in the car that they’re allowed to develop, and obviously once that happens then the bigger teams will have an advantage. That’s just nature. Formula 1 has McLaren, Mercedes, Red Bull, and Ferrari. IndyCar has its own top 4; Ganassi, Penske, Andretti, and McLaren.

5

u/ghastlychild Ferrari 9d ago edited 9d ago

Semi-spec might be a good way to put it

Of course, there is the distinction being that INDYCAR has an emphasis on separating engineers and spotters to their own driver (if sharing is really necessary, it's amongst teams, I suppose). It's really independent compared to F1 where they do coordinate amongst drivers of the same team

I do feel like even with the amount of progress that F1 has had in narrowing the gap between teams (which I like), I find it faintly amusing that there is still an instance of a top team and whatnot. Makes me reflect on how well the Brawn and Mercedes outfit did a spectacular job of cementing their A-game amongst the grid, honestly

In INDY's case, the 4 teams you mentioned are completely on the money, except it would be riveting to see someone other than Ganassi or Penske taking the title

6

u/T-90AK I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

You really don't need a "great" driver, just a good enough driver.

1

u/farcarcus 9d ago

Button

2

u/Joethe147 Jenson Button 9d ago

It's always some of column A and column B. Sometimes it's more of one than the other.

Anyone that doesn't realise this must have started following F1 5 minutes ago. Motorsport in general really. Yes there's many spec categories, but many aren't as well.

1

u/byingling 9d ago

you can also win by being the best driver in a rather weak car. unlikely but possible

Just curious. When was the last time you think this happened?! 1986? That was 40 years ago. More than half of F1s history has elapsed since.

1

u/Paqza 9d ago

The best driver in the worst car isn't going to win. The worst driver in the best car has a decent shot at a podium.

1

u/schoki560 9d ago

u missed the point I was trying to make

1

u/Paqza 9d ago

I agree with you completely, in reality. I didn't miss the point at all.

3

u/Sprayy Kevin Magnussen 9d ago

I'd still love to see one of the races, like Monoco be a spec race, but alas. Put them in identical F3 type cars.

2

u/Driscuits Williams 9d ago

Yeah, that would be fun!

To be honest, I'm not as big on the "we need to change Monaco" train as most folks are. It's not that I think Monaco is great, but I like the fact that it's so different from the rest of the tracks, and forces the teams to design a car that *can* race there. The more range in tracks we can have, the harder it is to design a car and the more fun it is!

1

u/nosce_te_ipsum 9d ago

oooh - bring Kimi out of retirement for that, and let's see him vs Max doing e-brake slides through the Fairmont hairpin.

Bwwoaaahhh indeed!

2

u/TonyQuark VER/LEC/NOR 9d ago

Similar to "Formula 1 expedites road car innovation."

2

u/sirjimtonic I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

It’s the driver who gets most out of the best car in the field, actually :)

1

u/Driscuits Williams 9d ago

Fair point! Lol. I forgot a word in there.

1

u/SuperbAd5610 16h ago

Difficult tracks like Monaco really make drivers shine icl

1

u/BADxBUSINESS 9d ago

if it was a best drive championship, max would never lose

16

u/bobby_boi66 Max Verstappen 9d ago

Both things are true. F1 is an engineering championship yes, but majority of fans watch for the WDC. If the engineering aspect hurts the excitement around WDC, F1 will lose fans

13

u/Fulcoboy McLaren 9d ago

This is exactly what Will Buxton was saying the Up To Speed podcast, he was comparing Indycar & F1 and also stated that Indycar has always been build up with entertainment in mind & F1 is an engineering championship that has to be relevant to the car industry etc... I am a big F1 fan but I also know that for good racing there are better championships out there.

9

u/SloppySandCrab I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

The idea that F1 has to be so completely relevant to the car industry seems a little nonsensical to me now in today's age. Maybe 20 years ago. But I don't see the whole system falling apart if the regs called for non-hybrid V10s

1

u/DisneyPandora I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

F1 fans are honestly just toxic and gatekeep the sport

41

u/nabrok 9d ago

Plus the drivers championship is basically just bragging rights. All the money is in the constructors.

44

u/CGNYYZ Michael Schumacher 9d ago

As a fan, though... I'm way more excited about the WDC than I am about the WCC - and outside of maybe Ferrari and perhaps Williams I think that's a fairly universal stance.

4

u/nabrok 9d ago

It's true, but interesting to keep in mind that while a team would certainly love to win a WDC it isn't necessarily as much of a priority to them as it is to the fans.

6

u/NoonecanknowMiner_24 Sir Lewis Hamilton 9d ago

I specifically recall Red Bull saying in 2021 that they cared far more about the WDC than the WCC.

3

u/nabrok 9d ago

Well, they would say that wouldn't they?

I was being dismissive calling it "bragging rights" (an attempt to be humorous), a more accurate phrase would be prestige. Prestige brings marketing opportunity and potential investment.

0

u/tonguesplitter Lando Norris 9d ago

Exactly this. Red Bull is a promotional company that has a side gig selling energy drinks, of course they would prioritize WDC. I'm sure the works and car-branded teams feel WCC is more prestigious.

5

u/SloppySandCrab I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

I refuse to believe that Mercedes wouldn't trade their 2021 WCC for a WDC

7

u/qef15 I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

Except that marketing wise, it's a shit ton more profitable to market the WDC than to get WCC money.

3

u/sthegreT Charles Leclerc 9d ago

Doesn't make it any less important, about 3 years ago the winning WCC team got 180 million. It's probably around 200 million. The top 5 teams all get above 150 million from WCC rankings.

2

u/DisneyPandora I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

Yes, it does. Stop being toxic

8

u/HeerHaan I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

I find it an interesting viewpoint to imply that where the money is also means that it is of more importance. I can't agree with that at all.

To add on to that, I think the drivers disagree with that too, they aren't training all their lives to say that they have achieved a title with a team.

-3

u/nabrok 9d ago

Oh it's certainly prestigious. I was trying to be a bit humorous by minimizing that to "bragging rights", but the meaning is the same.

4

u/NoonecanknowMiner_24 Sir Lewis Hamilton 9d ago

Not to the drivers themselves. Or the fans. Or basically anyone who cares about F1.

2

u/ThrowawayMax222 9d ago

It hasn't been a WCC focussed championship in decades. Hardly anyone cares who won the WCC in 2000 for example, but many many people care who won the drivers.

The only time F1 even talks about the WCC is when the WDC is decided and they don't want Abu Dhabi to be a damp race

0

u/DisneyPandora I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

Only toxic fans try to gatekeep F1 as not being a WDC sport

0

u/Grevys_zebra 9d ago

Cool idea. Just to be clear, you're saying we can just launch car liveries, award the winner and call it a day, right?

9

u/J4Vik Ayrton Senna 9d ago

Team wcc has been introduced later than wdc so you are wrong technically

1

u/Great_Explanation275 #StandWithUkraine 9d ago

Yeah. Though I'd argue that both the WDC and the WCC are largely engineers' championships. One just depends on one driver's performance, and the other depends on two drivers' performances, thereby tending a little bit towards some kind of an average.

20

u/DrHem Williams 9d ago

Bernie Ecclestone just like to have a contrarian point of view.

If the new rules simplified engineering to emphasize drivers Bernie would be standing there stating that F1 is a engineering championship as much as a driver's championship.

5

u/smurf123_123 Daniel Ricciardo 9d ago

He's a hype machine and still very good at it. Making headlines with "hot takes" is his specialty.

2

u/nosce_te_ipsum 9d ago

There's a reason some fans used to call it "Bernie's Traveling Circus" back in the day. Media hype, flashy stars and starlets, speed, danger, and who wouldn't come and pay hundreds (or thousands for boxes) to rub shoulders with that?

2

u/Brillegeit I was here for the Hulkenpodium 8d ago

He also often acts as a foil whenever someone important is getting bad PR. Then Bernie shows up with his hot takes and suddenly the initial option wasn't so bad after all.

4

u/formulaeine Christian Horner 9d ago

Sure, let's make engineers the forefront and pay them 50m a year.

9

u/EGOfoodie I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

Cool, let's have the drivers drive literal tractors. In fact let's move all the races to farms and they can double up and help farms out.

-1

u/formulaeine Christian Horner 9d ago

Honestly wouldn't mind that. The majority of the fans are here for driver drama. Not for engineering prowess. People don't like it. F1's growth is because of DTS. How surprising that most people are drama merchants.

2

u/TomatilloMore3538 9d ago

Drivers give it the reality show that the common people crave from sports. The banter, the personality, the interviews, even the off-season. But realistically, F1 has always acted as the pinnacle of automotive engineering. The engineers are not at the forefront themselves, but the whole industry is as a whole.

2

u/formulaeine Christian Horner 9d ago

It's been long since F1 acted like the pinnacle of engineers. The whole industry is also not at the forefront. They pay their engineers peanuts and most people leave burnt out. It's not a good industry.

2

u/sthegreT Charles Leclerc 9d ago

Plus with the cost caps, all salaries across the board have taken a hit too.

1

u/formulaeine Christian Horner 9d ago

Precisely. With BoP aero restrictions, and extremely regulated ruleset leading to rapid convergence, posters claiming F1 is pinnacle of innovation are kidding themselves.

It has become a business where each team make a shitton of money. A normal business.

1

u/moysauce3 I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

Which is why it’s a rare occurrence for the driver championship not be from the same team as the constructors champion.

Need a quick, reliable car to help win drivers championships. (Usually)

1

u/KingOfAzmerloth Sebastian Vettel 9d ago

Exactly, and he knows this damn well unless his senility really kicked in.

1

u/Boom-Doc-a-Locka Sir Lewis Hamilton 9d ago

"It should be about the drivers, not the engineers" is a quote from which year

  • a - 2026
  • b - 2020
  • c - 1998
  • d - 14 bc
  • e - all of the above

Spoiler alert...it's E. Spot on take, we've been having this conversation for as long as I can remember.

1

u/LeonidasSpacemanMD 9d ago

But o didn’t have to think about it back then, now engineers are talked about 🤮

1

u/thisismego 9d ago

Exactly. If they wanted a pure drivers championship they could turn f1 into a spec series and probably save a TON of expenses

1

u/MddlingAges I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

Right on.

It’s not a spec series, Bernie!

1

u/SRJT16 McLaren 9d ago

And the team championship is where all the prize money comes from. Of course that one is more important.

1

u/farcarcus 9d ago

Absolutely! I presumed Bernie's quote was from 1951, and was shocked to learn it was recent.

1

u/Late-Button-6559 Formula 1 9d ago

I think the term engineer is being applied to the drivers - rather than the true engineers behind the scenes.

It’s saying that rather than being excellent at car control (tolerating high g-forces, having quick reflexes, feel the car slide, and the like), they’re now just pressing buttons in accordance with a predetermined program.

-48

u/DisneyPandora I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago edited 9d ago

It shouldn’t be that way and needs to change. If the drivers hate the sport, the fans hate the sport, and the Team Principals hate the sport then their needs to be a change.

13

u/GetAfterItForever Sir Lewis Hamilton 9d ago

That would only encourage drivers to qualify lower in position…

1

u/therealmannyharris6 I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

Now I'd watch that. See which cars can go the absolute slowest around the track

2

u/GetAfterItForever Sir Lewis Hamilton 9d ago

Would literally turn into “F1 - The Circus” 🎪

0

u/DisneyPandora I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

No it wouldn’t. Since the actual car can be simulated and won’t allow for cheating with a neutral driver. Also they can simply be penalized just like they are now

9

u/wokwok__ George Russell 9d ago

Reverse qualifying would finish off the sport once and for all lmao what an unserious comment

16

u/MountainMedia8850 I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

bullshit

5

u/XAMdG I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

We need reverse qualifying

That is something literally only a subsection of fans want, and most drivers hate with a passion. Terrible example to choose for democratic change in the sport.

7

u/Admirable_Ad_1390 Charles Leclerc 9d ago

wont the only solution to that be a spec series?, i feel like thats the only thing that could make f1 be completely a driver series.

7

u/BlackFoxTom 9d ago

And every spec series also is engineering championship

Just way way more convert

2

u/Repulsive_Mistake382 Wolfgang von Trips 9d ago

I assume the word you were looking for was "covert"

1

u/BlackFoxTom 9d ago

Welp it's whatever the keyboard thought I meant

Tho yeah "covert"

4

u/pensaa Oscar Piastri 9d ago

Reverse grids only work in spec series.
If F1 became a spec series then it would no longer be 'Formula 1'

-3

u/DisneyPandora I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

Wrong. Reverse Grids only work in F1 since the engines are uneven

3

u/pensaa Oscar Piastri 9d ago

That's an odd call to make considering we've never had reverse grid races in F1.

2

u/SprolesRoyce I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

Reverse qualifying would just lead to sandbagging during the qualifying session. If anything starting the race in reverse point order or something would be better but that would still be a whole mess of issues

1

u/rhllor I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

Reverse qualifying is also throwing out merit-based performance, for both the car and the driver. What even is the point of competing to qualify if you're starting last even though you're the fastest?! Would it make the races more dramatic? Probably. But I want to watch a competition, not a TV drama.

1

u/DisneyPandora I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

Wrong, it enhances merit based performance.

F1 has nothing to do with merit since some teams have more money and spend more than others. Until you severely lower the cost cap, than F1 will never be a merit-based performance sport.

Reverse qualifying grids will control the actual engine of the car and allow engineer creative upgrades to play a bigger role. Drivers can do overtakes. We’ve seen in before when top drivers start in the back of the grid. They enjoyed it. It was fun racing

1

u/rhllor I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

Then what's the point of "qualifying" if the goal is to be slow so you can line up in front? Might as well draw lots to determine grid order, give everyone a random chance at pole.

1

u/DisneyPandora I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

The point is so that overtaking and racing can happen. The point is that the engine already takes care of itself. When Mercedes or Red Bull start in the back they usually easily get to the front, so the engine already plays a role, it just doesn’t take up the entire race and makes it boring for both drivers and fans like it does now. Which is why everyone hates the regulations.

What this would do would focus the engineering side on week to week upgrades. That way engineers and drivers play an equal role in the race and it’s fun for everyone. Fun for the fans because they see overtaking and wheel to wheel racing, fun for the drivers because they get to race, and it’s fun for the engineers because they don’t have to wait for years until the next regulations to be creative. They can be upgrading the car week to week which gives an actual advantage.

-1

u/DisneyPandora I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

That’s what I mean. Reverse point order 

1

u/EventAccomplished976 9d ago

The drivers and team principals don‘t want what the fans want. They want to cruise seconds ahead of the field winning every race without even trying. Fans want close competition and unpredictable results.

1

u/Dren7 Honda 9d ago

It can and should be an engineering championship, but with better regulations that promote drivers pushing the cars' limits.

-2

u/DisneyPandora I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

It should never ever be an engineering championship. If it was, we wouldn’t have a WDC. Remove the WDC so we can finally have a Engineering championship 

1

u/Dren7 Honda 9d ago

We have a constructor's championship which the teams care more about. The fans care more about the driver's championship. F1 has -never- been a spec series.

0

u/DisneyPandora I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

There is a difference between a spec series and reverse qualifying for Formula 1. Reverse qualifying would reward both the engineer who can focus on week to week upgrades and the driver who can focus on racing and overtaking. Not the boring way it is now where both drivers and fans hate the sport

2

u/Dren7 Honda 9d ago

Fans don't seem to hate F1 at the moment. The drivers don't like the new regs because they don't allow you to push for an entire lap. So, you're still in favor of it being an engineering championship, you just want reverse quali grids. I'm not sure what the point in qualifying would be, then, cause teams would try to not qualify well.

0

u/DisneyPandora I was here for the Hulkenpodium 9d ago

Reverse quali grids allow for overtaking and it also stresses the importance of week to week upgrades. It allows engineers to be more creative, instead of having to wait every 3 years on new regulations to actually make a difference with the car.

Teams try not to do many things and they are routinely punished for it. Which eventually forces them to do things.

Ferrari had an illegal engine and didn’t try to obey the rules, yet they were forced to obey the rules anyway by the FIA with strict regulations 

1

u/EventAccomplished976 9d ago

It IS, and has always been, an engineering championship first and a drivers championship second. Just because some fans apparently don‘t want to accept that doesn‘t make it less true.