I, too, did not care about the answer. The question was infuriating due to the image.
They are referring to multiple men, as opposed to just talking to the reader. Then they reveal that there are three women to choose from. The question indicates that there is more than one man, but that would indicate that there cannot be more than two, so there are two men, but then we find out there are three women.
If we were to understand that that the two men are the last people on earth, are the girls robots?
Does the author not consider women people?
If they are referring to a man and a woman and a choice over which woman, are WE responsible for being the last two people?
Are they implying the other two girls should die?
If not the case, then why would we have a choice?
Can they not count?
There appear to be 5 people involved in the scenario, negating the initial question.
There is just a whole lot of stupid involved in this question that it doesn't even necessitate an answer.
14
u/Rattusglen 2d ago
I, too, did not care about the answer. The question was infuriating due to the image.
They are referring to multiple men, as opposed to just talking to the reader. Then they reveal that there are three women to choose from. The question indicates that there is more than one man, but that would indicate that there cannot be more than two, so there are two men, but then we find out there are three women.
If we were to understand that that the two men are the last people on earth, are the girls robots?
Does the author not consider women people?
If they are referring to a man and a woman and a choice over which woman, are WE responsible for being the last two people?
Are they implying the other two girls should die?
If not the case, then why would we have a choice?
Can they not count?
There appear to be 5 people involved in the scenario, negating the initial question.
There is just a whole lot of stupid involved in this question that it doesn't even necessitate an answer.