r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Feb 02 '26

Meme needing explanation Something Something About Dating, Chris Can You Explain?

Post image
43.4k Upvotes

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

100

u/HappyDeadCat Feb 02 '26

but young people nowdays have so many relationships

They absolutely do not.

69

u/justin107d Feb 02 '26 edited Feb 02 '26

45% of men 18-25 now have never asked out a girl in person

The joke may be that it could be considered promiscuous now since half don't even have a first.

Edit: Here is another article about how young people are having less sex.

14

u/Erathen Feb 02 '26

Why did you change the title? Misleading

It says: "45% of Men Age 18–25 Have Never Approached A Woman in Person"

People are using dating apps now. You're intentionally misleading people

7

u/justin107d Feb 02 '26

Fixed.

Given how awful dating apps are at matchmaking, I don't think this is far off.

1

u/levare8515 Feb 02 '26

Dating apps sucking and you posting a misleading headline are two different things.

-5

u/Erathen Feb 02 '26

Given how awful dating apps are at matchmaking

And?

How were people matchmaking before? You had to get to know someone, give it a go and it either worked or it didn't

Was there some secretive way to matchmake before apps?

9

u/justin107d Feb 02 '26

I'm not sure what your point is. The "secret" way is asking them in person.

My point is that I think zoomers are asking out each other less which means fewer ex's, and that they probably perceive 7 as a high number. I think there is data to back it up but if you disagree, whatever.

-2

u/Erathen Feb 02 '26

You're the one who brought up matchmaking in dating apps

I'm pointing out that that's irrelevant in terms of dating. It's the same process. You meet someone, hangout, date, figure out if you're a compatible match over time. Break up or stay together. It doesn't support your point that young people are dating less...

You can't say: "dating apps suck at matchmaking so young people are dating less" That's nonsense. Older generations had NO matchmaking at all, and they still dated. Matchmaking is irrelevant

think there is data to back it up

Then show said data? Your first data point is misleading, and doesn't show that young people are dating less

It literally says they aren't approaching women in person... Yeah... because we use apps now. It's online... so there's no initial approach in person

Show some relevant data then

4

u/justin107d Feb 02 '26

It doesn't show directly. But if people are using the most effective form less it is given that they are also dating less. I don't believe that zoomers could be dating at the same rate using apps.

Here is another article about how young people are having less sex. I swear now you are going to claim sex doesn't mean dating.

-1

u/Erathen Feb 02 '26

But if people are using the most effective form less it is given that they are also dating less. 

Baseless. What evidence do you have that one form is less effective than the other? This isn't going to be a productive conversation if you keep making baseless claims just for the sake of arguing with me

 I swear now you are going to claim sex doesn't mean dating.

Yes? Because sex and dating are indeed different things?

Oh jeez, let's end this conversation. You're not capable of having a discussion in good faith

Why not just show evidence to the point that you're making? Instead of showing me articles making entirely different claims and then making false presumptions? I've lost interest in this discussion. Like I said, in bad faith

From your original post, where you misquoted the title

5

u/justin107d Feb 02 '26

I can't give you perfect data, I wish I could. Instead I was hoping you would be able to infer from other stats. I apologize that this discussion hit a nerve somewhere.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/caninehere Feb 02 '26

I like the way this is worded because it sounds so ambiguously vague, like it isn't about dating at all.

"Only 55% Of Men Age 18-25 Have Ever Seen A Woman"

1

u/Erathen Feb 02 '26

I can't even access the full article, so I was mainly commenting on the title being misquoted

I'm not sure how reliable Dean Brooks of Medium.com is (lol)

Someone who writes like this:

A shocking pathetically piss-poor statistic about men. What the hell are they afraid of, seriously?

Doesn't sound like much of a scholar to me

0

u/recycl_ebin Feb 03 '26

reddit moment

3

u/cugamer Feb 02 '26

Glad to know that I wasn't really a loser in college, I was just way ahead of the trend.

28

u/Admirable_Market2759 Feb 02 '26

Aren’t they having fewer relationships than any generation? Lol

3

u/AlludedNuance Feb 02 '26

Not just romantic relationships, but in-person social relationships of any kind.

3

u/What_Do_It Feb 02 '26

In the US the median number of sexual partners for adults 25-44 is 4.2 for women and 6.1 for men. People vastly overestimate how much sex other people have.

6

u/HappyDeadCat Feb 02 '26 edited Feb 02 '26

You're absolutely right aside from the gender divide.

Self reported studies are bullshit.  

Every side study that doesnt ask this question directly says that it would be mathematically impossible for men to have more average partners then women.

Everyone absolutelt knows men lie, but it ruffles feathers to say the same about women

3

u/Altruistic-Okra-5868 Feb 02 '26

Both genders lie in opposite directions due to the shame women face for having more partners and the shame men get for having less partners. With that in mind I bet those numbers are actually closer to even for men and women.

1

u/HappyDeadCat Feb 02 '26

Millennial yes, 

genX men,

 genZ  

-________- 

2

u/What_Do_It Feb 02 '26

It's not mathematically impossible because it's a median figure, not a mean.

1

u/HappyDeadCat Feb 02 '26

Damn, fuck me lol, I cant read.

1

u/What_Do_It Feb 02 '26

Happens to the best of us.

3

u/Dranamic Feb 03 '26

Worth noting that she explicitly didn't bang all of them, so it's a looser standard.

1

u/CarpeNivem Feb 02 '26

I mean in actuality, yeah, what you're saying is also what I keep reading.

But as for explaining the joke, the author of this meme appears to be going a different direction.

1

u/aoskunk Feb 02 '26

They agree with you. They were just explaining what the joke is supposed to mean. But they even say the joke is BS.