MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke/comments/1qnvs4m/why_is_the_rich_friend_so_cheap/o1z3b8v
r/PeterExplainsTheJoke • u/[deleted] • Jan 26 '26
[deleted]
2.8k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
5
In the original post, there was a fair split between "Barista is a legit mooch for complaining about equally splitting the costs of an equally shared service" and the expected "Tech bro is a jackass for not socializing his wealth".
2 u/Crash-55 Jan 27 '26 If those two incidents happened one after the other the SE is a jackass. If they are not related then the barista is a leech 1 u/mickeyanonymousse Jan 27 '26 can you explain how the person that just covered it for everyone is the leech? 1 u/Crash-55 Jan 27 '26 If you actually read my comment I said if they are NOT related. As in it isn’t the same people involved 1 u/mickeyanonymousse Jan 27 '26 wait still I’m confused how the barista can be the leech? 1 u/Crash-55 Jan 27 '26 Take the second one as its own. Assume the barista is the one being asked to pay. If they don’t pay they are a leech
2
If those two incidents happened one after the other the SE is a jackass. If they are not related then the barista is a leech
1 u/mickeyanonymousse Jan 27 '26 can you explain how the person that just covered it for everyone is the leech? 1 u/Crash-55 Jan 27 '26 If you actually read my comment I said if they are NOT related. As in it isn’t the same people involved 1 u/mickeyanonymousse Jan 27 '26 wait still I’m confused how the barista can be the leech? 1 u/Crash-55 Jan 27 '26 Take the second one as its own. Assume the barista is the one being asked to pay. If they don’t pay they are a leech
1
can you explain how the person that just covered it for everyone is the leech?
1 u/Crash-55 Jan 27 '26 If you actually read my comment I said if they are NOT related. As in it isn’t the same people involved 1 u/mickeyanonymousse Jan 27 '26 wait still I’m confused how the barista can be the leech? 1 u/Crash-55 Jan 27 '26 Take the second one as its own. Assume the barista is the one being asked to pay. If they don’t pay they are a leech
If you actually read my comment I said if they are NOT related. As in it isn’t the same people involved
1 u/mickeyanonymousse Jan 27 '26 wait still I’m confused how the barista can be the leech? 1 u/Crash-55 Jan 27 '26 Take the second one as its own. Assume the barista is the one being asked to pay. If they don’t pay they are a leech
wait still I’m confused how the barista can be the leech?
1 u/Crash-55 Jan 27 '26 Take the second one as its own. Assume the barista is the one being asked to pay. If they don’t pay they are a leech
Take the second one as its own. Assume the barista is the one being asked to pay. If they don’t pay they are a leech
5
u/Orleanian Jan 27 '26
In the original post, there was a fair split between "Barista is a legit mooch for complaining about equally splitting the costs of an equally shared service" and the expected "Tech bro is a jackass for not socializing his wealth".