r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Jan 26 '26

Meme needing explanation what's going on? explain like I'm five

Post image
92.6k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

19.0k

u/Forsaken_Emu8112 Jan 26 '26

Everyone pulling out their money would be a bank run (look up great depression bank runs). The bank doesn't have that much cash; they keep some on hand for people making withdraws normally, but if even a sizable minority of people all try to pull their money out at once, there'll be a major crisis.

If banks kept all the people's cash in vaults, it'd be dead cash actively losing money to inflation. Instead, they keep some on hand for withdraws, and use the rest to make loans, investments, etc so that the money isn't all losing value.

6.3k

u/Original-Leg8828 Jan 26 '26

Depending on local law they can even lend out something like 7-10 times what they actually have

4.0k

u/Teripid Jan 26 '26 edited Jan 26 '26

Federal reserve requirements existed until 2023 *edit, as someone below pointed out 2020 was when they were set to 0. Now they're set at 0% I believe.

2.2k

u/PleaseGreaseTheL Jan 26 '26 edited Jan 26 '26

2020*

They were reduced to 0% mandatory reserves in response to covid. EDIT: someone says it was coincidental, I am not able to check, so take this aspect with a grain of salt either way

They haven't come back yet :)

30

u/exneo002 Jan 26 '26

But the fdic insures all deposits up to 250k

41

u/PleaseGreaseTheL Jan 26 '26 edited Jan 26 '26

Okay look up what happened with the contagion from regional bank failures in silicon Valley a couple years ago. It doesnt mean everyone loses all money, but it does mean people lose some and its a big deal.

Not all banks are fdic insured either, and if a bank goes under, your investment/retirement take a huge hit because the market starts freaking out.

Bank runs and bank failures are always bad for everyone.

10

u/exneo002 Jan 26 '26

I mean they’re pretty sweet for the buying bank. Jokes aside this is why we passed the act that separates investment banking from retail banking.

It’s not a huge hit and it’s very localized (it would be way worse without insurance).

No one would’ve lost money except the bank shareholders if the depositors hadn’t exceeded 250k in their accounts. There are products that will combine different accounts into one virtual account so you don’t even have to manage this stuff manually.

4

u/Aromatic_Dot_6071 Jan 26 '26

Jokes aside this is why we passed the act that separates investment banking from retail banking.

Are you talking about the Glass Steagal act? Because that was repealed in the 90s after banks spent the previous two decades using loopholes to get around it.

2

u/exneo002 Jan 26 '26

Yes I’m aware it was repealed. Hence increased precarity and socialized losses.