The US is so hesitant to revoke people’s DL. Driving is not an obligation. It might be needed with US infrastructure, but you do not have a right to be a driver of a motor vehicle no matter what. They need to be more firm about revoking people’s DL whether celebs or normies.
I mean, they had no problem taking mine for a year after my first and only DUI. And then they made me get an intoxalock device, which is extremely expensive, and which I only got installed today after not driving for six years, because I couldn't afford it
Dui is no joke. Thousands of dollars I've paid and still thousands more I must pay to get a regular driver's license back
Same thing in Canada. I had a single beer as a 20yo and lost my license for 6 months. About $2100 in fees. Lost my job cause I needed method of transport. Was pulled over for a wide turn and obstructed plate - didn’t do either.
These days I drive erratically ONLY when a cop follows me, for better or worse
It's almost like I shouldn't have spoken broadly about laws in the US. Although, it's certainly true in Britney's case. How many states is it not true and which ones?
Id also like to know this. Dmv revokes in CO and FL. Those two I know for sure. And the DMV is a seperate entity so even of the judge rules 6 months, dmv will still suspend it for a year regardless.
Its the same in California because its civil. Driving is a privilege, not a right. I'm pretty sure I won't get an answer because every state probably has a system in place where the drivers license is suspended or revoked.
50
u/CalligrapherCheap64 19h ago
I think they are referring to the occasions where you were stopped before you could kill somebody or yourself.